Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查患者自控镇静的安全性、可行性及可接受性:前瞻性研究

The safety, feasibility, and acceptability of patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy: prospective study.

作者信息

Lee D W H, Chan A C W, Wong S K H, Li A C N, Sze T S, Chung S C S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, North District Hospital, 9 Po Kin Road, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Hong Kong Med J. 2004 Apr;10(2):84-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of patient-controlled sedation for elective day-case colonoscopy, and the factors predicting patients' unwillingness to use patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy.

DESIGN

Prospective, non-randomised study.

SETTING

University-affiliated endoscopy centre, Hong Kong.

PARTICIPANTS

Five hundred patients who underwent elective day-case colonoscopy were prospectively recruited from January 2001 to June 2002.

INTERVENTION

Sedation for colonoscopy was a mixture of propofol and alfentanil, which was delivered by means of a patient-controlled syringe pump. Each bolus delivered 4.8 mg propofol and 12 microg alfentanil. No loading dose was used and the lockout time was set at zero.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cardiopulmonary complications, dose of patient-controlled sedation used, recovery time, satisfaction score, delayed side-effects, and the willingness to use the same sedation protocol for future colonoscopy. A multiple stepwise logistic regression model was used to assess which factors might predict unwillingness to use patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy.

RESULTS

The mean (standard deviation) age of patients was 53.0 (13.9) years. The mean dose of propofol consumed was 0.93 (0.69) mg/kg. Forty-three (8.6%) patients developed hypotension during the procedure. The mean satisfaction score was 7.2 (2.6). Sixteen (3.2%) patients developed delayed side-effects. The median (interquartile range) recovery time was 0 (0-5) minutes. Approximately 78% of patients were willing to use patient-controlled sedation for future colonoscopy if needed. Younger age (<50 years), female sex, a higher mean dose of sedatives used, a lower satisfaction score, and the presence of delayed side-effects were independent factors that were associated with patients' unwillingness to use patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy.

CONCLUSION

. The use of patient-controlled sedation for elective colonoscopy is safe, feasible, and acceptable to most patients.

摘要

目的

评估患者自控镇静用于择期日间结肠镜检查的安全性、可行性和可接受性,以及预测患者不愿使用患者自控镇静进行结肠镜检查的因素。

设计

前瞻性、非随机研究。

地点

香港大学附属内镜中心。

参与者

2001年1月至2002年6月前瞻性招募了500例行择期日间结肠镜检查的患者。

干预措施

结肠镜检查的镇静采用丙泊酚和阿芬太尼混合液,通过患者自控注射泵给药。每次推注给予4.8毫克丙泊酚和12微克阿芬太尼。未使用负荷剂量,锁定时间设定为零。

主要观察指标

心肺并发症、患者自控镇静的使用剂量、恢复时间、满意度评分、延迟副作用,以及未来结肠镜检查使用相同镇静方案的意愿。采用多步逐步逻辑回归模型评估哪些因素可能预测患者不愿使用患者自控镇静进行结肠镜检查。

结果

患者的平均(标准差)年龄为53.0(13.9)岁。丙泊酚的平均消耗量为0.93(0.69)毫克/千克。43例(8.6%)患者在检查过程中出现低血压。平均满意度评分为7.2(2.6)。16例(3.2%)患者出现延迟副作用。中位(四分位间距)恢复时间为0(0 - 5)分钟。约78%的患者表示如果需要,未来结肠镜检查愿意使用患者自控镇静。年龄较小(<50岁)、女性、使用镇静剂的平均剂量较高、满意度评分较低以及出现延迟副作用是与患者不愿使用患者自控镇静进行结肠镜检查相关的独立因素。

结论

患者自控镇静用于择期结肠镜检查对大多数患者而言是安全、可行且可接受的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验