Arampatzis Adamantios, Stafilidis Savvas, Morey-Klapsing Gaspar, Brüggemann Gert-peter
German Sport University of Cologne, Institute for Biomechanics, Cologne, Germany.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Mar;36(3):451-9. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000117166.87736.0a.
The purpose of this study was to examine two hypotheses: (a) the stiffness of the surface influences the leg stiffness of the subjects during drop jumps, and (b) drop jumping performance (jumping height and energy rates of the subject's center of mass during the contact phase) increases when decreasing surface stiffness due to a greater energy storage capacity of the surface for a given acting force.
Ten female subjects performed a series of drop jumps from 40-cm height onto two sprung surfaces with different stiffness. Those trials of each subject displaying the maximal mechanical power during the upward phase were analyzed. The ground reaction forces were measured using a force plate. Sagittal kinematics of the subject's body positions and the deformation of the surface were recorded using two high-speed video cameras.
On the soft surface, the jumping height and the energy rates of the subjects during the contact phase were greater than on the hard one. The energy delivered by the subjects during the upward phase, the leg and joint stiffness, as well as the range of motion of the subjects remained unchanged for both surfaces.
The absolute energy loss is lower for the hard surface, but the jumping performance is greater for the soft one. The reason is a higher ratio of positive to negative mechanical work done by the subjects during the contact phase. The adjustment of the subjects to different surfaces is not only dependent on the stiffness of the surface but also on the intensity of the movement.
本研究旨在检验两个假设:(a)表面刚度会影响受试者在纵跳过程中的腿部刚度;(b)由于在给定作用力下表面具有更大的能量储存能力,当表面刚度降低时,纵跳表现(接触阶段受试者质心的跳跃高度和能量率)会提高。
10名女性受试者从40厘米高处进行一系列纵跳,落在两个刚度不同的弹性表面上。分析每个受试者在向上阶段表现出最大机械功率的那些试验。使用测力板测量地面反作用力。使用两台高速摄像机记录受试者身体位置的矢状面运动学和表面变形情况。
在软表面上,受试者在接触阶段的跳跃高度和能量率大于在硬表面上。两个表面上受试者在向上阶段传递的能量、腿部和关节刚度以及受试者的运动范围均保持不变。
硬表面的绝对能量损失较低,但软表面的跳跃表现更好。原因是受试者在接触阶段所做的正负机械功的比率更高。受试者对不同表面的适应不仅取决于表面的刚度,还取决于运动的强度。