Nanas John N, Tsagalou Eleftheria P, Kanakakis John, Nanas Serafim N, Terrovitis John V, Moon Thomas, Anastasiou-Nana Maria I
University of Athens School of Medicine, Department of Clinical Therapeutics, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Chest. 2004 Apr;125(4):1198-204. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.4.1198.
To examine the effects of long-term intermittent dobutamine infusion, combined with oral amiodarone in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) refractory to standard medical treatment.
Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Inpatient and outpatient heart failure clinic in a university teaching hospital.
Thirty patients with end-stage CHF refractory to standard medical treatment who could be weaned from dobutamine therapy after a first 72-h infusion were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive IV infusions of placebo (group 1; 14 patients) vs dobutamine in a dose of 10 micro g/kg/min (group 2; 16 patients) for 8 h every 14 days. All patients received standard medical therapy and also were treated with oral amiodarone, 400 mg/d, which was started at least 2 weeks before randomization.
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed a 60% reduction in the risk of death from any cause in the group treated with the combination of dobutamine and amiodarone, compared with the group treated with placebo and amiodarone (hazard ratio, 0.403; 95% confidence interval, 0.164 to 0.992; p = 0.048). The 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 69% and 44%, respectively, in the dobutamine-treated group, vs 28% and 21%, respectively, in the placebo-treated group (p < 0.05 for both comparisons). Median survival times were 574 and 144 days, respectively, for groups 2 and 1. At 6 months, the New York Heart Association functional class was significantly improved in the patients who survived from both groups.
Long-term intermittent dobutamine infusion combined with amiodarone added to the conventional drugs improved the survival of patients with advanced CHF that was refractory to conventional treatment.
探讨长期间歇性静脉输注多巴酚丁胺联合口服胺碘酮对标准药物治疗无效的充血性心力衰竭(CHF)患者的影响。
前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。
一所大学教学医院的住院和门诊心力衰竭诊所。
30例标准药物治疗无效的终末期CHF患者,在首次72小时输注后可停用多巴酚丁胺治疗,将其双盲随机分为两组,一组接受安慰剂静脉输注(第1组,14例患者),另一组接受剂量为10μg/kg/min的多巴酚丁胺静脉输注(第2组,16例患者),每14天输注8小时。所有患者均接受标准药物治疗,且均接受口服胺碘酮治疗,剂量为400mg/d,在随机分组前至少2周开始使用。
Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,与接受安慰剂和胺碘酮治疗的组相比,接受多巴酚丁胺和胺碘酮联合治疗的组任何原因导致的死亡风险降低了60%(风险比,0.403;95%置信区间,0.164至0.992;p = 0.048)。多巴酚丁胺治疗组的1年和2年生存率分别为69%和44%,而安慰剂治疗组分别为28%和21%(两组比较p均<0.05)。第2组和第1组的中位生存时间分别为574天和144天。6个月时,两组存活患者的纽约心脏协会心功能分级均有显著改善。
在传统药物基础上加用长期间歇性多巴酚丁胺输注联合胺碘酮可提高对传统治疗无效的晚期CHF患者的生存率。