循证医学当前的认识论问题。
Current epistemological problems in evidence based medicine.
作者信息
Ashcroft R E
机构信息
Imperial College London, Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, London, UK.
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 2004 Apr;30(2):131-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.007039.
Abstract
Evidence based medicine has been a topic of considerable controversy in medical and health care circles over its short lifetime, because of the claims made by its exponents about the criteria used to assess the evidence for or against the effectiveness of medical interventions. The central epistemological debates underpinning the debates about evidence based medicine are reviewed by this paper, and some areas are suggested where further work remains to be done. In particular, further work is needed on the theory of evidence and inference; causation and correlation; clinical judgment and collective knowledge; the structure of medical theory; and the nature of clinical effectiveness.
摘要
在其短暂的发展历程中，循证医学一直是医疗卫生领域颇具争议的话题，原因在于其倡导者对用于评估支持或反对医学干预有效性证据的标准所提出的主张。本文回顾了支撑循证医学辩论的核心认识论辩论，并指出了一些仍有待进一步开展工作的领域。特别是，在证据与推理理论、因果关系与相关性、临床判断与集体知识、医学理论结构以及临床有效性的本质等方面，仍需开展进一步的工作。
相似文献
1
Current epistemological problems in evidence based medicine.循证医学当前的认识论问题。
J Med Ethics. 2004 Apr;30(2):131-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.007039.
2
Ethical and epistemological problems when applying evidence-based medicine to pain management.
Pain Pract. 2005 Dec;5(4):298-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2005.00032.x.
3
Epistemologic inquiries in evidence-based medicine.循证医学中的认识论探究。
Cancer Control. 2009 Apr;16(2):158-68. doi: 10.1177/107327480901600208.
4
Evidence-based medicine and ethics: a practical approach.循证医学与伦理学：一种实用方法。
J Med Ethics. 2004 Apr;30(2):126-30. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.007211.
5
Evidence-based medicine and epistemological imperialism: narrowing the divide between evidence and illness.循证医学与认识论帝国主义：缩小证据与疾病之间的差距。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2011 Oct;17(5):868-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01723.x. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
6
The evidence-based paradox and the question of the Tree of Knowledge.循证悖论与知识之树问题
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):650-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00929.x.
7
Evidence and ethics in medicine.医学中的证据与伦理
Perspect Biol Med. 2008 Summer;51(3):418-31. doi: 10.1353/pbm.0.0040.
8
The proper role of evidence in complementary/alternative medicine.证据在补充/替代医学中的恰当作用。
J Med Philos. 2010 Feb;35(1):7-18. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhp059. Epub 2009 Dec 21.
9
Incurable suffering from the "hiatus theoreticus"? Some epistemological problems in modern medicine and the clinical relevance of philosophy of medicine.饱受“理论间隙”之苦而无法治愈？现代医学中的一些认识论问题及医学哲学的临床相关性。
Theor Med Bioeth. 1998 Jun;19(3):229-51. doi: 10.1023/a:1009961831768.
10
Whither our art? Clinical wisdom and evidence-based medicine.我们的医学何去何从？临床智慧与循证医学。
Med Health Care Philos. 2002;5(3):273-80. doi: 10.1023/a:1021116516342.
引用本文的文献
1
From Efficacy to Effectiveness: Evaluating Psychedelic Randomized Controlled Trials for Trustworthy Evidence-Based Policy and Practice.从疗效到效果：评估迷幻药随机对照试验以获取可靠的循证政策与实践依据
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2025 Apr;13(2):e70097. doi: 10.1002/prp2.70097.
2
Editorial: Insights in human and medical genomics: 2022.社论：2022年人类与医学基因组学洞察
Front Genet. 2023 Sep 25;14:1287894. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1287894. eCollection 2023.
3
In BMI We Trust: Reframing the Body Mass Index as a Measure of Health.我们信赖身体质量指数：将身体质量指数重新定义为一种健康衡量指标。
Soc Theory Health. 2018 Aug;16(3):256-271. doi: 10.1057/s41285-017-0055-0. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
4
Evidence for personalised medicine: mechanisms, correlation, and new kinds of black box.个性化医疗的证据：机制、相关性及新型黑箱
Theor Med Bioeth. 2019 Apr;40(2):103-121. doi: 10.1007/s11017-019-09482-z.
5
Uncovering the Truth.揭开真相。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2017 Nov 6;12(1):49-50. doi: 10.1177/1559827617737938. eCollection 2018 Jan-Feb.
6
Back to Basics.回归基础。
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2017 May 16;11(6):448-450. doi: 10.1177/1559827617710177. eCollection 2017 Nov-Dec.
7
Public drug policy for children in Canada.加拿大针对儿童的公共药品政策。
CMAJ. 2017 Jul 31;189(30):E990-E994. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170380.
8
[The scientific entertainer in primary health care].[初级卫生保健中的科学传播者]
Aten Primaria. 2012 Sep;44(9):549-54. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2011.07.019. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
9
Mechanisms, continental approaches, trials, and evolutionary medicine: new work in the philosophy of medicine.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2011 Feb;32(1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s11017-010-9169-2.
10
Balancing health care evidence and art to meet clinical needs: policymakers' perspectives.权衡医疗保健证据和艺术以满足临床需求：政策制定者的观点。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;15(6):970-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01209.x.
本文引用的文献
1
Indifference of subjects: an alternative to equipoise in randomized clinical trials.受试者的无差别状态：随机临床试验中均衡性的一种替代方案
Soc Philos Policy. 2002 Summer;19(2):295-323. doi: 10.1017/s0265052502192120.
2
The Declaration of Helsinki and clinical trials: a focus on placebo-controlled trials in schizophrenia.《赫尔辛基宣言》与临床试验：聚焦精神分裂症的安慰剂对照试验
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Feb;160(2):356-62. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.2.356.
3
The virtues of evidence.证据的优点。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2002;23(4-5):403-12. doi: 10.1023/a:1021217908383.
4
Equipoise, knowledge and ethics in clinical research and practice.临床研究与实践中的 equipoise（平衡）、知识与伦理。 （注：equipoise 这个词在医学领域有特定含义，常指在临床研究中对于不同治疗方案的利弊处于一种不确定的平衡状态，但按照要求不做额外解释）
Bioethics. 1999 Jul;13(3-4):314-26. doi: 10.1111/1467-8519.00160.
5
Placebo-controlled trials and active-control trials in the evaluation of new treatments. Part 2: practical issues and specific cases.新疗法评估中的安慰剂对照试验和活性对照试验。第2部分：实际问题与具体案例。
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Sep 19;133(6):464-70. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-6-200009190-00015.
6
Giving medicine a fair trial. Trials should not second guess what patients want.给予药物公正的试验机会。试验不应猜测患者的需求。
BMJ. 2000 Jun 24;320(7251):1686. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1686.
7
Why "underpowered" trials are not necessarily unethical.为何“效能不足”的试验不一定不道德。
Lancet. 1997 Sep 13;350(9080):804-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)02290-3.
Zotero 插件