Suppr超能文献

台湾金门地区死亡证明书的质量

Quality of death certificates in Quemoy, Taiwan.

作者信息

Wu Shiow-Ing, Chou Pesus, Tsai Shih-Tzer, Yu Hui-Ju, Lu Tsung-Hsueh, Chen Tien-Sher, Chen Swei-Hu

机构信息

Taipei City STD Control Center, Taipei City Government, Institute of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University [corrected] Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Formos Med Assoc. 2004 Feb;103(2):151-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The age-adjusted mortality rate on the island of Quemoy was the lowest of any county in Taiwan in the years 2000-2001. However, the island's rate of mortality due to cardiovascular diseases fluctuates widely. This fluctuation suggests that Quemoy may be issuing inaccurate death certificates.

METHODS

To assess the quality of death certificates from Quemoy, 123 (15.3%) medical records for 800 deaths between 1994 and 1998 were reviewed by 3 medical specialists. The underlying cause of death from the original death certificate was compared to the underlying cause of death determined by 3 reviewers based on review of all available medical records.

RESULTS

The agreement index for all causes of death was 72.4%. Neoplasms had the highest sensitivity and positive predictive value for correct determination of underlying cause of death. Cardiovascular diseases had higher sensitivity, but lower positive predictive value than respiratory diseases. Neoplasms were under-reported by 25.5% but cardiovascular diseases were over-reported by 34.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, mortality statistics in Quemoy, which are based on death certificate data, may underestimate the frequency of neoplasms and overestimate cardiovascular diseases as underlying causes of death. Our findings also suggest that researchers should exercise considerable caution when using death certificate data to determine cause of death in etiologic studies, especially in neoplasms and cardiovascular diseases.

摘要

背景与目的

2000 - 2001年,金门岛的年龄调整死亡率在台湾各县中是最低的。然而,该岛心血管疾病导致的死亡率波动幅度很大。这种波动表明金门可能在出具不准确的死亡证明。

方法

为评估金门死亡证明的质量,3位医学专家对1994年至1998年期间800例死亡病例中的123份(15.3%)病历进行了审查。将原始死亡证明上的根本死因与3位审查员根据所有可用病历审查确定的根本死因进行比较。

结果

所有死因的一致性指数为72.4%。肿瘤在正确确定根本死因方面具有最高的敏感性和阳性预测值。心血管疾病的敏感性高于呼吸系统疾病,但阳性预测值低于呼吸系统疾病。肿瘤的报告率低了25.5%,但心血管疾病的报告率高了34.3%。

结论

因此,基于死亡证明数据的金门死亡率统计可能低估了肿瘤的发生频率,高估了心血管疾病作为根本死因的发生率。我们的研究结果还表明,研究人员在病因学研究中使用死亡证明数据来确定死因时应格外谨慎,尤其是在肿瘤和心血管疾病方面。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验