Hunt L W, Silverstein M D, Reed C E, O'Connell E J, O'Fallon W M, Yunginger J W
Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minn. 55905.
JAMA. 1993 Apr 21;269(15):1947-52.
To quantify the reliability of death certificate data concerning asthma.
The complete medical records of decedents were reviewed by a physician certified in allergy and pulmonology who determined the cause of death without having access to the original death certificate. Disagreements between the death certificate and the reviewer were adjudicated by an expert panel.
The community of Rochester, Minn.
The mortality cohort included 339 deaths from a larger cohort of 5241 Rochester residents who received medical treatment for asthma between 1964 and 1983.
Kappa coefficients were used to measure agreement beyond that expected by chance between the reviewer and the death certificate. The sensitivity and specificity of the death certificate diagnosis of asthma were calculated against the standard of the reviewer/panel diagnosis.
Death certificates reported asthma as an immediate or underlying cause of death in 22 instances (6%), whereas the reviewer/panel identified asthma in 53 cases (16%). In four cases, the death certificate listed asthma and the panel identified another cause of death. The death certificate had a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 99% compared with the reviewer/panel. Agreement between death certificates and the reviewer was not influenced by whether an autopsy was performed.
Death certificate diagnosis of asthma as an underlying cause of death had a low sensitivity but a high specificity. Increases in mortality due to asthma are not likely caused by false-positive diagnoses of asthma as an underlying cause of death. Asthma mortality rates, determined from death certificate data, may indeed underestimate actual asthma-related mortality.
量化有关哮喘的死亡证明数据的可靠性。
由一名过敏和肺病认证医生审查死者的完整病历,该医生在无法获取原始死亡证明的情况下确定死因。死亡证明与审查者之间的分歧由一个专家小组裁决。
明尼苏达州罗切斯特市社区。
死亡队列包括来自5241名罗切斯特居民的较大队列中的339例死亡,这些居民在1964年至1983年期间接受了哮喘治疗。
使用kappa系数来衡量审查者与死亡证明之间超出偶然预期的一致性。根据审查者/小组诊断的标准计算死亡证明对哮喘诊断的敏感性和特异性。
死亡证明报告哮喘为直接或根本死因的有22例(6%),而审查者/小组确定有53例(16%)。在4例中,死亡证明列出哮喘,而小组确定了另一个死因。与审查者/小组相比,死亡证明的敏感性为42%,特异性为99%。死亡证明与审查者之间的一致性不受是否进行尸检的影响。
将哮喘诊断为根本死因的死亡证明敏感性低但特异性高。哮喘导致的死亡率增加不太可能是由于将哮喘误诊为根本死因的假阳性诊断所致。根据死亡证明数据确定的哮喘死亡率可能确实低估了实际的哮喘相关死亡率。