• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[复杂慢性病中与赋权相关的优质护理指标的评估与验证]

[Evaluation and validation of quality care indicators relative to empowerment in complex chronic disease].

作者信息

Gagnon Johanne, Grenier Raymond

机构信息

Faculté des Sciences Infirmières, l'Université Laval, Québec.

出版信息

Rech Soins Infirm. 2004 Mar(76):50-67.

PMID:15085567
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to identify, validate and rank, through multi-attribute hierarchical analysis, indicators of quality of care related to the empowerment of patients having a chronic complex illness, or their natural care givers. This methodological study was carried within case management and was theoretically based on the quality model of Donabedian (1980) and the empowerment theory of Zimmerman (1995), while also drawing from values underlying nursing practise described by the health promotion model of Allen (1977). Two groups of professional and one group of non professional were considered. Using the DELPHI technique and interviews, the study has 1) provided an evaluation model for quality of care comprising 239 elements (12 main attributes, 75 secondary attributes and 152 indicators), 2) allowed its validation, and 3) its ranking by experts. The discussion encompasses theoretical, empirical and methodological considerations.

摘要

本研究的目的是通过多属性层次分析,识别、验证并对与慢性复杂疾病患者或其天然护理者赋权相关的护理质量指标进行排序。这项方法学研究是在病例管理中进行的,理论上基于多纳贝迪安(1980年)的质量模型和齐默尔曼(1995年)的赋权理论,同时也借鉴了艾伦(1977年)健康促进模型所描述的护理实践的潜在价值观。研究考虑了两组专业人员和一组非专业人员。通过德尔菲技术和访谈,该研究:1)提供了一个包含239个要素(12个主要属性、75个次要属性和152个指标)的护理质量评估模型;2)对其进行了验证;3)由专家进行了排序。讨论涵盖了理论、实证和方法学方面的考虑。

相似文献

1
[Evaluation and validation of quality care indicators relative to empowerment in complex chronic disease].[复杂慢性病中与赋权相关的优质护理指标的评估与验证]
Rech Soins Infirm. 2004 Mar(76):50-67.
2
Nurses' responses to expert patients: the rhetoric and reality of self-management in long-term conditions: a grounded theory study.护士对专家型患者的回应:长期疾病自我管理的言辞与现实:一项扎根理论研究
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Sep;43(7):803-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.10.011. Epub 2005 Dec 15.
3
Barriers to patient involvement in health service planning and evaluation: an exploratory study.患者参与卫生服务规划与评估的障碍:一项探索性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Feb;70(2):234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.09.009. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
4
Patient empowerment in theory and practice: polysemy or cacophony?患者赋权的理论与实践:一词多义还是声音嘈杂?
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Apr;66(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.008. Epub 2006 Nov 2.
5
Influential factors for self-care in ambulatory care heart failure patients: a qualitative perspective.门诊心力衰竭患者自我护理的影响因素:质性研究视角
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2006;16(1):13-9.
6
Client-nurse relationships in home-based palliative care: a critical analysis of power relations.居家姑息治疗中的医患关系:权力关系的批判性分析
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Aug;16(8):1435-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01720.x.
7
Empowerment in the interpersonal field: discourses of acute mental health nurses.人际领域中的赋权:急性精神科护士的论述
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2007 Aug;14(5):485-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2007.01116.x.
8
[Evaluation of empowerment: health promotion practitioners' perceptions and concepts. Results of a qualitative study in Australia].[赋权评估:健康促进从业者的认知与概念。澳大利亚一项定性研究的结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Dec;70(12):755-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103260. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
9
Effect of empowerment on professional practice environments, work satisfaction, and patient care quality: further testing the Nursing Worklife Model.赋权对专业实践环境、工作满意度和患者护理质量的影响:对护理工作生活模型的进一步检验。
J Nurs Care Qual. 2008 Oct-Dec;23(4):322-30. doi: 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000318028.67910.6b.
10
The effects of structural and psychological empowerment on perceived respect in acute care nurses.结构赋权和心理赋权对急症护理护士感知尊重的影响。
J Nurs Manag. 2008 Mar;16(2):214-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00781.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of a new Prescription Quality Index.开发并验证一个新的处方质量指数。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Oct;70(4):500-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03597.x.
2
Assessing enablement in clinical practice: a systematic review of available instruments.评估临床实践中的使能:现有工具的系统评价。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;16(6):1301-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01332.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
3
Improving healthy behaviors in type 1 diabetic patients by interactive frameworks.通过交互式框架改善1型糖尿病患者的健康行为。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:322-6.