Loss J, Wise M
Institut für Medizinmanagement und Gesundheitswissenschaften, Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth.
Gesundheitswesen. 2008 Dec;70(12):755-63. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103260. Epub 2008 Dec 11.
Although the concepts of participation and empowerment are hallmarks of the WHO vision of health promotion, it is acknowledged that they are difficult to evaluate. Devising adequate study designs, indicators and methods for the assessment of participation and empowerment should take into account the experiences, concerns, working conditions and constraints of health promotion practitioners.
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 17 experienced practitioners in community-based health promotion in New South Wales, Australia. The interviews covered benefits of and barriers to the evaluation of empowerment, key indicators and methodological aspects. Interview transcripts were examined using thematic content analysis.
The idea of evaluating empowerment is supported by health promotion practitioners, provided that empowerment is part of the programme logic and/or programme theory. The interviews highlighted the importance of a receptive environment for evaluation of empowerment and participation to take root. The resistence of health authorities towards empowerment indicators is a great challenge for funding of evaluations. Community members are to be included in the evaluation process, al-though it is not always easy to do so in a representative way and empowering approach. The best methods to capture whether empowerment has occurred in a programme are qualitative ones. The positive experiences that the interview partners made with innovative qualitative methods encourage further investment in developing new research designs.
尽管参与和赋权的概念是世界卫生组织健康促进愿景的标志,但人们承认它们难以评估。设计适当的研究设计、指标和方法来评估参与和赋权时,应考虑健康促进从业者的经验、关注点、工作条件和限制因素。
对澳大利亚新南威尔士州17名有经验的社区健康促进从业者进行了半结构化访谈。访谈涵盖了赋权评估的益处和障碍、关键指标及方法学方面。使用主题内容分析法对访谈记录进行了审查。
健康促进从业者支持评估赋权的想法,前提是赋权是项目逻辑和/或项目理论的一部分。访谈强调了一个接受性环境对于赋权和参与评估得以扎根的重要性。卫生当局对赋权指标的抵制是评估资金投入的一大挑战。社区成员应纳入评估过程,尽管以具有代表性和赋权性的方式做到这一点并不总是容易。捕捉项目中是否发生赋权的最佳方法是定性方法。访谈对象在创新性定性方法方面的积极经验鼓励进一步投资开发新的研究设计。