Carandini Matteo, Sengpiel Frank
Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zurich and Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.
J Vis. 2004 Mar 12;4(3):130-43. doi: 10.1167/4.3.1.
Neurons in cat primary visual cortex (V1) are clustered according to their preference for stimulus position, orientation, spatial frequency, and eye of presentation, thereby giving rise to functional maps. It is not known, however, whether a similar arrangement is present for stimulus contrast. Neurons in cat V1 vary considerably in their contrast responses, and might be clustered in a systematic fashion in this respect. Additionally, stimulus contrast might affect other functional maps. For example, there has been debate over whether the contrast threshold of neurons in cytochrome oxidase blobs is lower than elsewhere. Here we have imaged intrinsic signals to measure orientation maps in cat V1 at a range of contrast levels. We determined, on a pixel-by-pixel basis, contrast-response functions and orientation tuning curves. The fit parameters describing contrast responses were more or less uniform: We found no regions where neurons have lower contrast threshold than elsewhere. If such regions do exist, their functional maps must be substantially weaker than maps of orientation preference. Moreover, we found that contrast has no impact on maps of orientation preference: The orientation selectivity of each pixel is invariant with stimulus contrast. The contrast invariance that we demonstrate at the level of maps is well known at the level of single neurons. It suggests that neurons contributing to a pixel response generally have similar orientation preferences or similar contrast responses. The latter explanation is likely to hold in pinwheel centers, where preferred orientation of nearby neurons can differ markedly. In summary, our data suggest that contrast is represented uniformly over the surface of cat V1, and changes in contrast do not affect maps of orientation preference.
猫初级视觉皮层(V1)中的神经元根据它们对刺激位置、方向、空间频率和呈现眼的偏好进行聚类,从而形成功能图谱。然而,目前尚不清楚刺激对比度是否也存在类似的排列方式。猫V1中的神经元在对比度反应上有很大差异,并且在这方面可能以一种系统的方式聚类。此外,刺激对比度可能会影响其他功能图谱。例如,关于细胞色素氧化酶斑中神经元的对比度阈值是否低于其他区域一直存在争议。在这里,我们通过成像内在信号来测量猫V1在一系列对比度水平下的方向图谱。我们逐像素地确定了对比度反应函数和方向调谐曲线。描述对比度反应的拟合参数或多或少是均匀的:我们没有发现神经元对比度阈值低于其他区域的情况。如果这样的区域确实存在,它们的功能图谱一定比方向偏好图谱弱得多。此外,我们发现对比度对方向偏好图谱没有影响:每个像素的方向选择性与刺激对比度无关。我们在图谱水平上证明的对比度不变性在单个神经元水平上是众所周知的。这表明对像素反应有贡献的神经元通常具有相似的方向偏好或相似的对比度反应。后一种解释可能适用于风车中心,在那里附近神经元的偏好方向可能有显著差异。总之,我们的数据表明对比度在猫V1表面均匀呈现,对比度的变化不会影响方向偏好图谱。