Troyer T W, Krukowski A E, Priebe N J, Miller K D
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0444, USA.
J Neurosci. 1998 Aug 1;18(15):5908-27. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-15-05908.1998.
The origin of orientation selectivity in visual cortical responses is a central problem for understanding cerebral cortical circuitry. In cats, many experiments suggest that orientation selectivity arises from the arrangement of lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) afferents to layer 4 simple cells. However, this explanation is not sufficient to account for the contrast invariance of orientation tuning. To understand contrast invariance, we first characterize the input to cat simple cells generated by the oriented arrangement of LGN afferents. We demonstrate that it has two components: a spatial-phase-specific component (i.e., one that depends on receptive field spatial phase), which is tuned for orientation, and a phase-nonspecific component, which is untuned. Both components grow with contrast. Second, we show that a correlation-based intracortical circuit, in which connectivity between cell pairs is determined by the correlation of their LGN inputs, is sufficient to achieve well tuned, contrast-invariant orientation tuning. This circuit generates both spatially opponent, "antiphase" inhibition ("push-pull"), and spatially matched, "same-phase" excitation. The inhibition, if sufficiently strong, suppresses the untuned input component and sharpens responses to the tuned component at all contrasts. The excitation amplifies tuned responses. This circuit agrees with experimental evidence showing spatial opponency between, and similar orientation tuning of, the excitatory and inhibitory inputs received by a simple cell. Orientation tuning is primarily input driven, accounting for the observed invariance of tuning width after removal of intracortical synaptic input, as well as for the dependence of orientation tuning on stimulus spatial frequency. The model differs from previous push-pull models in requiring dominant rather than balanced inhibition and in predicting that a population of layer 4 inhibitory neurons should respond in a contrast-dependent manner to stimuli of all orientations, although their tuning width may be similar to that of excitatory neurons. The model demonstrates that fundamental response properties of cortical layer 4 can be explained by circuitry expected to develop under correlation-based rules of synaptic plasticity, and shows how such circuitry allows the cortex to distinguish stimulus intensity from stimulus form.
视觉皮层反应中方向选择性的起源是理解大脑皮层神经回路的核心问题。在猫身上,许多实验表明方向选择性源于外侧膝状体核(LGN)传入纤维与4层简单细胞的排列方式。然而,这种解释不足以说明方向调谐的对比度不变性。为了理解对比度不变性,我们首先描述由LGN传入纤维的定向排列产生的猫简单细胞的输入。我们证明它有两个成分:一个空间相位特异性成分(即一个依赖于感受野空间相位的成分),它对方向进行调谐,以及一个相位非特异性成分,它不进行调谐。两个成分都随对比度增加。其次,我们表明一个基于相关性的皮层内回路,其中细胞对之间的连接性由它们的LGN输入的相关性决定,足以实现良好调谐的、对比度不变的方向调谐。这个回路产生空间对抗的“反相”抑制(“推挽”)和空间匹配的“同相”兴奋。如果抑制足够强,它会抑制未调谐的输入成分,并在所有对比度下锐化对调谐成分的反应。兴奋放大调谐反应。这个回路与实验证据一致,该证据表明简单细胞接收的兴奋性和抑制性输入之间存在空间对抗以及相似的方向调谐。方向调谐主要由输入驱动,这解释了去除皮层内突触输入后观察到的调谐宽度不变性,以及方向调谐对刺激空间频率的依赖性。该模型与之前的推挽模型不同,它需要占主导地位而非平衡的抑制,并预测4层抑制性神经元群体应该以对比度依赖的方式对所有方向的刺激做出反应,尽管它们的调谐宽度可能与兴奋性神经元的相似。该模型表明,皮层第4层的基本反应特性可以由预期在基于相关性的突触可塑性规则下发展的神经回路来解释,并展示了这样的神经回路如何使皮层区分刺激强度和刺激形式。