Raphling D L
Psychoanal Q. 1992 Jul;61(3):352-69.
Interpretation is a product of compromise formation that requires optimal use of the analyst's aggression to be an effective analytic intervention. Aggressive aims useful for the interpretive act are problematic for analysts and have led both to clinical difficulties and to various theoretical reactions against considering interpretation essential for analytic progress. In analysis, diverging aims of analyst and patient are highlighted in connection with the analyst's function as interpreter. The interactions between patient and analyst pertaining to interpretation provide insights into the patient's intrapsychic conflicts that may be less apparent in other material.
解释是妥协形成的产物，它需要分析师充分利用其攻击性才能成为一种有效的分析干预。对解释行为有用的攻击性目标对分析师来说是有问题的，这既导致了临床困难，也引发了各种理论上的反应，反对将解释视为分析进展的关键要素。在精神分析中，分析师和患者目标的分歧与分析师作为解释者的功能密切相关。患者与分析师在解释方面的互动能让我们洞察到患者内心的冲突，而这些冲突在其他素材中可能不那么明显。
