Halpern Scott D, Berns Jeffrey S, Israni Ajay K
Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Am J Med. 2004 May 1;116(9):606-12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.12.025.
To evaluate the willingness of patients with end-stage renal disease to switch from conventional hemodialysis to short daily hemodialysis, and to determine what health benefits clinical trials of daily hemodialysis would have to document for patients to switch regimens.
We studied all patients receiving conventional hemodialysis (defined as three times per week) at three dialysis centers in Philadelphia during a 4-month period. Patients indicated their willingness to switch to daily hemodialysis (defined as six 2- to 3-hour in-center treatments per week) in each of 21 scenarios presented via an interactive computer display. We used conjoint analysis to determine how patients' decisions were influenced by four attributes of daily hemodialysis: predicted life expectancy, quality of life, number of annual hospitalizations, and weekly transportation time to and from the dialysis center.
Of 126 patients interviewed, 55 (44%) would not choose daily hemodialysis regardless of its health benefits. The remaining 71 patients (56%) indicated that they would consider switching if daily hemodialysis was shown to yield certain health benefits. Patients were more willing to switch to daily hemodialysis as the associated life expectancy and average quality of life increased, and as the number of annual hospitalizations and weekly transportation time decreased (all P <0.001).
Although daily hemodialysis has received broad support from nephrologists, funding agencies, and lawmakers as the emerging standard of care for patients with end-stage renal disease, upcoming clinical trials would have to document substantial health benefits in order for patients to switch to daily hemodialysis, and many patients may still decline this regimen regardless of the documented benefits.
评估终末期肾病患者从传统血液透析转换为每日短时血液透析的意愿,并确定每日血液透析的临床试验必须证明哪些健康益处才能使患者改变治疗方案。
我们对费城三个透析中心在4个月期间接受传统血液透析(定义为每周三次)的所有患者进行了研究。通过交互式计算机显示屏呈现21种情景,让患者表明他们在每种情景下转换为每日血液透析(定义为每周在透析中心进行6次每次2至3小时的治疗)的意愿。我们使用联合分析来确定每日血液透析的四个属性如何影响患者的决策:预测寿命、生活质量、每年住院次数以及每周往返透析中心的交通时间。
在接受访谈的126名患者中,55名(44%)无论每日血液透析有何健康益处都不会选择。其余71名患者(56%)表示,如果每日血液透析显示出某些健康益处,他们会考虑转换。随着预期寿命和平均生活质量的提高,以及每年住院次数和每周交通时间的减少,患者更愿意转换为每日血液透析(所有P<0.001)。
尽管每日血液透析已得到肾病学家、资助机构和立法者的广泛支持,被视为终末期肾病患者新出现的护理标准,但即将进行的临床试验必须证明有显著的健康益处,患者才会转换为每日血液透析,而且许多患者可能仍会拒绝这种治疗方案,无论所证明的益处如何。