Chen Wei-Min, Broman Karl W, Liang Kung-Yee
Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Genet Epidemiol. 2004 May;26(4):265-72. doi: 10.1002/gepi.10315.
Two of the major approaches for linkage analysis with quantitative traits in humans include variance components and Haseman-Elston regression. Previously, these were viewed as quite separate methods. We describe a general model, fit by use of generalized estimating equations (GEE), for which the variance components and Haseman-Elston methods (including many of the extensions to the original Haseman-Elston method) are special cases, corresponding to different choices for a working covariance matrix. We also show that the regression-based test of Sham et al. ([2002] Am. J. Hum. Genet. 71:238-253) is equivalent to a robust score statistic derived from our GEE approach. These results have several important implications. First, this work provides new insight regarding the connection between these methods. Second, asymptotic approximations for power and sample size allow clear comparisons regarding the relative efficiency of the different methods. Third, our general framework suggests important extensions to the Haseman-Elston approach which make more complete use of the data in extended pedigrees and allow a natural incorporation of environmental and other covariates.
人类数量性状连锁分析的两种主要方法包括方差成分法和哈斯曼 - 埃尔斯顿回归法。以前,这些方法被视为完全不同的方法。我们描述了一个通过广义估计方程(GEE)拟合的通用模型,对于该模型,方差成分法和哈斯曼 - 埃尔斯顿法(包括对原始哈斯曼 - 埃尔斯顿法的许多扩展)是特殊情况,对应于工作协方差矩阵的不同选择。我们还表明,沙姆等人([2002]《美国人类遗传学杂志》71:238 - 253)基于回归的检验等同于从我们的GEE方法导出的稳健得分统计量。这些结果有几个重要意义。首先,这项工作为这些方法之间的联系提供了新的见解。其次,功效和样本量的渐近近似允许对不同方法的相对效率进行清晰比较。第三,我们的通用框架为哈斯曼 - 埃尔斯顿方法提出了重要扩展,该扩展能更充分地利用扩展家系中的数据,并允许自然地纳入环境和其他协变量。