• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新生儿包皮环切术:对世界上最古老且最具争议手术的综述。

Neonatal circumcision: a review of the world's oldest and most controversial operation.

作者信息

Alanis Mark C, Lucidi Richard S

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004 May;59(5):379-95. doi: 10.1097/00006254-200405000-00026.

DOI:10.1097/00006254-200405000-00026
PMID:15097799
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Untimely old, circumcision has elicited more controversy and war of words than any surgical procedure in history. Although previous claims of benefits like curing masturbation, gout, epilepsy, and even insanity were no doubt absurd, important research has shed light on real medical benefits of circumcision. In particular, the procedure has consistently shown to result in the decreased risk of debilitating and costly diseases such as HIV, cervical cancer, and infantile urinary tract infection. Because of advances in the understanding of the anatomy of the foreskin and pain conditioning in infants, prevailing attitudes have changed about anesthesia and analgesia during the procedure. This article objectively summarizes the bulk of significant medical literature over the last century to provide an accurate statement about what we know and what we do not know about neonatal circumcision, including its history, epidemiology, medical benefits, complications, contraindications, techniques, management for pain, and current controversies.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader should be able to describe the evolution of circumcision, to list the potential benefits of circumcision, to outline the various neonatal circumcision techniques, and to summarize the data on the use of analgesia for circumcision.

摘要

未标注

不合时宜地过时了,包皮环切术引发的争议和口舌之争比历史上任何外科手术都要多。尽管先前声称包皮环切术有诸如治愈手淫、痛风、癫痫甚至精神错乱等益处无疑是荒谬的,但重要的研究已揭示了包皮环切术真正的医学益处。特别是,该手术一直显示出能降低感染艾滋病病毒、宫颈癌和婴幼儿尿路感染等使人虚弱且费用高昂的疾病的风险。由于在包皮解剖学和婴儿疼痛调节方面的认识进展,人们对该手术期间的麻醉和镇痛的普遍态度已经改变。本文客观地总结了过去一个世纪大量重要的医学文献,以准确阐述我们对新生儿包皮环切术已知和未知的情况,包括其历史、流行病学、医学益处、并发症、禁忌症、技术、疼痛管理以及当前的争议。

目标受众

妇产科医生、家庭医生。

学习目标

阅读本文后,读者应能够描述包皮环切术的演变过程,列出包皮环切术的潜在益处,概述各种新生儿包皮环切术技术,并总结包皮环切术镇痛使用的数据。

相似文献

1
Neonatal circumcision: a review of the world's oldest and most controversial operation.新生儿包皮环切术:对世界上最古老且最具争议手术的综述。
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004 May;59(5):379-95. doi: 10.1097/00006254-200405000-00026.
2
Neonatal circumcision.新生儿包皮环切术
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001 Dec;48(6):1539-57. doi: 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70390-4.
3
Male circumcision.男性割礼。
Pediatrics. 2012 Sep;130(3):e756-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1990. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
4
Neonatal circumcision.新生儿包皮环切术
Urol Clin North Am. 1995 Feb;22(1):57-65.
5
The circumcision question.包皮环切术问题。
Postgrad Med. 1992 May 1;91(6):237-42, 244. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1992.11701325.
6
[Circumcision in male newborns--update].[男性新生儿包皮环切术——最新进展]
Harefuah. 2013 Mar;152(3):129-31, 184.
7
Circumcision. The uniquely American medical enigma.包皮环切术。独特的美国医学谜团。
Urol Clin North Am. 1985 Feb;12(1):123-32.
8
Circumcision related to urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted infections, human immunodeficiency virus infections, and penile and cervical cancer.割礼与尿路感染、性传播感染、人类免疫缺陷病毒感染以及阴茎癌和宫颈癌有关。
Int J Urol. 2013 Aug;20(8):769-75. doi: 10.1111/iju.12154. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
9
[Male circumcision from an infectiological point of view].[从传染病学角度看男性包皮环切术]
Hautarzt. 2015 Jan;66(1):30-7. doi: 10.1007/s00105-014-3550-4.
10
The 2010 Royal Australasian College of Physicians' policy statement 'Circumcision of infant males' is not evidence based.2010 年澳大利亚皇家内科医学院政策声明“男婴割礼”没有循证医学证据。
Intern Med J. 2012 Jul;42(7):822-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02823.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the effects of ring block and dorsal penile nerve block on parental satisfaction for circumcision operation in children: randomized controlled trial.环扎阻滞与阴茎背神经阻滞对儿童包皮环切术父母满意度影响的比较:随机对照试验。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Apr 8;40(1):101. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05681-5.
2
Incidence of circumcision among insured adults in the United States.美国参保成年人行割礼的发生率。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 17;17(10):e0275207. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275207. eCollection 2022.
3
Dissemination of the Spear & Shield Project using a Training of Trainers Model: A reflection on challenges and successes.
Spear & Shield 项目的培训师培训模式传播:挑战与成功的反思。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 May 26;12(5):622-629. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac013.
4
Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions: a Cochrane review.环切器械与标准手术技术在青少年和成年男性包皮环切术中的比较:一项 Cochrane 综述。
BJU Int. 2022 Jul;130(1):26-34. doi: 10.1111/bju.15604. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
5
Circumcision as an Intervening Strategy against HIV Acquisition in the Male Genital Tract.包皮环切术作为男性生殖道预防感染艾滋病毒的干预策略。
Pathogens. 2021 Jun 25;10(7):806. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10070806.
6
Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions.环切器械与标准手术技术在青少年和成年男性割礼中的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 31;3(3):CD012250. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012250.pub2.
7
A controlled trial of Gomco versus Plastibell for neonatal circumcisions in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯一项关于Gomco与Plastibell用于新生儿包皮环切术的对照试验。
Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2020 Sep;7(3):132-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpam.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
8
A Systematic Review of Race/Ethnicity and Parental Treatment Decision-Making.种族/族裔与父母治疗决策的系统评价
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2018 Oct;57(12):1453-1464. doi: 10.1177/0009922818788307. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
9
Prospective comparison of two models of integrating early infant male circumcision with maternal child health services in Kenya: The Mtoto Msafi Mbili Study.肯尼亚将早期婴儿男性包皮环切术与母婴健康服务相结合的两种模式的前瞻性比较:姆托托·姆萨菲·姆比利研究
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 7;12(9):e0184170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184170. eCollection 2017.
10
The influence of socioeconomic factors on choice of infant male circumcision provider in rural Ghana; a community level population based study.社会经济因素对加纳农村地区男童包皮环切术提供者选择的影响;一项基于社区层面人群的研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0937-2.