Suppr超能文献

沙特阿拉伯一项关于Gomco与Plastibell用于新生儿包皮环切术的对照试验。

A controlled trial of Gomco versus Plastibell for neonatal circumcisions in Saudi Arabia.

作者信息

Bawazir Osama A

机构信息

Department of Surgery Faculty of Medicine in Umm Al-Qura University Faculty of Medicine, KSA, P.O.box 715, Makkah, 21955, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2020 Sep;7(3):132-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpam.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gomco or Plastibell devices are the most widely used method for circumcision. The present work was aimed to assess the incidence of complications in infants of ages up to six months in two used methods.

METHODS

It was a prospective randomized study conducted at a pediatric surgery clinic in 3 hospitals in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Eight hundred and five children, their ages were less than 6 months were enrolled for the present work. Children were randomized into two groups: Groups P and G using Plastibell and Gomco Circumcision methods, respectively. Statistical analysis of data was performed by using SPSS Version 17. Chi-square test and independent sample -test was applied to compare both qualitative and quantitative variables, respectively. -value was considered as significant difference at <0.05.

RESULTS

Seven hundred eighty three children were were enrolled in this investigation. Plastibell method was concomitant with low volume of bleeding in comparison with Gomco method ( < 0.001). Incidence of complications including infection, penile edema, proximal migration and redundant skin was higher in Plastibell device method (<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Gomco circumcision is the safer method and is accompanied with lowest rate of complication.

摘要

背景

Gomco或Plastibell器械是最广泛使用的包皮环切术方法。本研究旨在评估这两种方法在6个月以下婴儿中的并发症发生率。

方法

这是一项在沙特阿拉伯吉达3家医院的儿科外科诊所进行的前瞻性随机研究。805名年龄小于6个月的儿童参与了本研究。儿童被随机分为两组:分别使用Plastibell和Gomco包皮环切术方法的P组和G组。使用SPSS 17版对数据进行统计分析。卡方检验和独立样本检验分别用于比较定性和定量变量。P值<0.05被认为有显著差异。

结果

783名儿童参与了本研究。与Gomco方法相比,Plastibell方法的出血量较少(P<0.001)。Plastibell器械法的并发症发生率包括感染、阴茎水肿、近端移位和包皮过长较高(P<0.05)。

结论

Gomco包皮环切术是更安全的方法,并发症发生率最低。

相似文献

5
Newborn circumcision outcomes: are parents satisfied with the results?新生儿包皮环切术的结果:父母对结果满意吗?
Pediatr Surg Int. 2014 Mar;30(3):333-8. doi: 10.1007/s00383-013-3430-5. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
6
Is neonatal circumcision judicious?新生儿包皮环切术是否明智?
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Aug;17(4):266-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965417.
9
Gomco circumcision: When is it safe?戈姆科包皮环切术:何时是安全的?
J Pediatr Surg. 2001 Jul;36(7):1047-9. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.24739.
10
Plastibell circumcision: Comparison between neonates and infants.包皮环套环切术:新生儿与婴儿的比较
Urol Ann. 2020 Oct-Dec;12(4):347-351. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_146_19. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

本文引用的文献

6
Late complications of circumcision in Iran.伊朗包皮环切术的晚期并发症
Pediatr Surg Int. 2006 May;22(5):442-5. doi: 10.1007/s00383-006-1672-1. Epub 2006 Apr 22.
10
Gomco circumcision: When is it safe?戈姆科包皮环切术:何时是安全的?
J Pediatr Surg. 2001 Jul;36(7):1047-9. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.24739.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验