Schmitter-Edgecombe Maureen, Wright Matthew J
Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4820, USA.
Neuropsychology. 2004 Apr;18(2):353-61. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.18.2.353.
Twenty-four severe closed-head injury (CHI) participants and 24 controls completed event-based prospective memory tasks concurrently with an ongoing working memory task. The event cue was either integrated with the ongoing working memory task (focal cue) or peripheral to it. Prospective remembering was poorer for the CHI group in both the focal- and peripheral-cue conditions. The groups did not differ on the ongoing task. The peripheral cue and the integrated focal cue also did not differ in ability to trigger prospective remembering. The results suggest that, even with highly salient event cues, severe CHI participants (> 1 year postinjury) are more likely than controls to exhibit prospective memory failures. The data revealed a link between CHI participants' prospective memory failures and momentary lapses of intention.
24名重度闭合性颅脑损伤(CHI)参与者和24名对照组人员在进行一项持续的工作记忆任务的同时,完成了基于事件的前瞻性记忆任务。事件线索要么与正在进行的工作记忆任务整合在一起(焦点线索),要么与之无关。在焦点线索和非焦点线索条件下,CHI组的前瞻性记忆都较差。两组在进行中的任务上没有差异。非焦点线索和整合的焦点线索在触发前瞻性记忆的能力上也没有差异。结果表明,即使有高度显著的事件线索,重度CHI参与者(受伤后>1年)比对照组更有可能出现前瞻性记忆失败。数据揭示了CHI参与者前瞻性记忆失败与瞬间意图缺失之间的联系。