Sangrujee Nalinee, Cáceres Victor M, Cochi Stephen L
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Immunization Program, 1600 Clifton Rd., MS-E05, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Jan;82(1):9-15. Epub 2004 Feb 26.
An analysis was conducted to estimate the costs of different potential post-polio certification immunization policies currently under consideration, with the objective of providing this information to policy-makers.
We analyzed three global policy options: continued use of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV); OPV cessation with optional inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV); and OPV cessation with universal IPV. Assumptions were made on future immunization policy decisions taken by low-, middle-, and high-income countries. We estimated the financial costs of each immunization policy, the number of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) cases, and the global costs of maintaining an outbreak response capacity. The financial costs of each immunization policy were based on estimates of the cost of polio vaccine, its administration, and coverage projections. The costs of maintaining outbreak response capacity include those associated with developing and maintaining a vaccine stockpile in addition to laboratory and epidemiological surveillance. We used the period 2005-20 as the time frame for the analysis.
OPV cessation with optional IPV, at an estimated cost of US$ 20,412 million, was the least costly option. The global cost of outbreak response capacity was estimated to be US$ 1320 million during 2005-20. The policy option continued use of OPV resulted in the highest number of VAPP cases. OPV cessation with universal IPV had the highest financial costs, but it also had the least number of VAPP cases. Sensitivity analyses showed that global costs were sensitive to assumptions on the cost of the vaccine. Analysis also showed that if the price per dose of IPV was reduced to US$ 0.50 for low-income countries, the cost of OPV cessation with universal IPV would be the same as the costs of continued use of OPV.
Projections on the vaccine price per dose and future coverage rates were major drivers of the global costs of post-certification polio immunization. The break-even price of switching to IPV compared with continuing with OPV immunizations is US$ 0.50 per dose of IPV. However, this doses not account for the cost of vaccine-derived poliovirus cases resulting from the continued use of OPV. In addition to financial costs, risk assessments related to the re-emergence of polio will be major determinants of policy decisions.
进行一项分析以估算当前正在考虑的不同潜在的脊髓灰质炎认证后免疫政策的成本,目的是将此信息提供给政策制定者。
我们分析了三种全球政策选择:继续使用口服脊髓灰质炎疫苗(OPV);停止使用OPV并选择性使用灭活脊髓灰质炎疫苗(IPV);停止使用OPV并普遍接种IPV。对低收入、中等收入和高收入国家未来的免疫政策决策进行了假设。我们估算了每种免疫政策的财务成本、疫苗相关麻痹性脊髓灰质炎(VAPP)病例数以及维持疫情应对能力的全球成本。每种免疫政策的财务成本基于脊髓灰质炎疫苗成本、其接种费用以及覆盖率预测的估算。维持疫情应对能力的成本包括与建立和维持疫苗储备以及实验室和流行病学监测相关的成本。我们将2005 - 2020年期间用作分析的时间框架。
停止使用OPV并选择性接种IPV,估计成本为204.12亿美元,是成本最低的选择。2005 - 2020年期间,疫情应对能力的全球成本估计为13.2亿美元。继续使用OPV的政策选择导致VAPP病例数最多。停止使用OPV并普遍接种IPV的财务成本最高,但VAPP病例数最少。敏感性分析表明,全球成本对疫苗成本假设敏感。分析还表明,如果低收入国家每剂IPV的价格降至0.50美元,停止使用OPV并普遍接种IPV的成本将与继续使用OPV的成本相同。
每剂疫苗价格和未来覆盖率的预测是认证后脊髓灰质炎免疫全球成本的主要驱动因素。与继续使用OPV免疫相比,转向IPV的盈亏平衡价格是每剂IPV 0.50美元。然而,这并未考虑因继续使用OPV导致的疫苗衍生脊髓灰质炎病毒病例的成本。除了财务成本外,与脊髓灰质炎再次出现相关的风险评估将是政策决策的主要决定因素。