Suppr超能文献

间变性大细胞淋巴瘤中爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒缺失:一项根据世界卫生组织标准分类的64例病例研究。

Absence of Epstein-Barr virus in anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a study of 64 cases classified according to World Health Organization criteria.

作者信息

Herling Marco, Rassidakis George Z, Jones Dan, Schmitt-Graeff Annette, Sarris Andreas H, Medeiros L Jeffrey

机构信息

Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Hum Pathol. 2004 Apr;35(4):455-9. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2003.10.013.

Abstract

The frequency of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) has been controversial. The interpretation of previous studies is complicated by the use of nonuniform EBV detection methods and the inclusion of cases of CD30-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and so-called "ALCL, Hodgkin-like," as defined in the Revised European-American Lymphoma classification scheme. In the current World Health Organization (WHO) classification system, both of these tumors are excluded from the ALCL category. Also, recently developed antibodies (eg, the antibody specific for PAX-5/B-cell-specific activator protein [BSAP]) provide new, sensitive tools for identifying neoplasms of B-cell lineage that can morphologically resemble ALCL. In this study we evaluated 64 cases of ALCL of T- or null-cell lineage, defined according to the WHO classification system, for the presence of EBV. All tumors were negative for B-cell antigens, including PAX-5/BSAP and CD20 or CD79a. The study group included 27 (42%) anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive (18 T-cell and 9 null-cell) and 37 (58%) ALK-negative (30 T-cell and 7 null-cell) tumors analyzed by in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) or immunohistochemistry for EBV-latent membrane protein type 1. All 64 cases were negative for EBV. We conclude, based on the current definition of ALCL in the WHO classification, there is no role for EBV in ALCL arising in Western patients. We suggest that published reports of EBV in a small proportion of ALCL cases in Western patients can be explained by the inclusion of tumors no longer considered to be in the current classification of ALCL, such as CD30-positive anaplastic tumors of B-cell origin.

摘要

在间变性大细胞淋巴瘤(ALCL)中,爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)的频率一直存在争议。既往研究的解读因使用了不统一的EBV检测方法以及纳入了修订的欧美淋巴瘤分类方案中定义的CD30阳性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤病例和所谓的“霍奇金样ALCL”而变得复杂。在当前的世界卫生组织(WHO)分类系统中,这两种肿瘤均被排除在ALCL类别之外。此外,最近开发的抗体(例如针对PAX-5/ B细胞特异性激活蛋白[BSAP]的特异性抗体)为识别形态上可能类似于ALCL的B细胞系肿瘤提供了新的、敏感的工具。在本研究中,我们根据WHO分类系统对64例T细胞或无细胞系ALCL病例进行了EBV检测。所有肿瘤的B细胞抗原均为阴性,包括PAX-5/ BSAP、CD20或CD79a。该研究组包括27例(42%)间变性淋巴瘤激酶(ALK)阳性(18例T细胞和9例无细胞)和37例(58%)ALK阴性(30例T细胞和7例无细胞)肿瘤,通过原位杂交检测EBV编码RNA(EBER)或免疫组织化学检测EBV潜伏膜蛋白1型。所有64例病例的EBV均为阴性。基于WHO分类中ALCL的当前定义,我们得出结论,EBV在西方患者发生的ALCL中不起作用。我们认为,已发表的关于西方患者中一小部分ALCL病例存在EBV的报告,可能是由于纳入了当前ALCL分类中不再认为属于该类别的肿瘤,如B细胞起源的CD30阳性间变性肿瘤。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验