Suppr超能文献

相似文献

1
Human genetics, environment, and communities of color: ethical and social implications.
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 May;112(6):740-5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6731.
2
The developing brain and the environment: an introduction.
Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Jun;108 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):373-4. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108s3373.
3
Environmental justice screening tools: Implications for nursing.
Public Health Nurs. 2019 May;36(3):411-421. doi: 10.1111/phn.12593. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
4
5
Environmental justice: building a unified vision of health and the environment.
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Apr;110 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):141-4. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110s2141.
6
Survey on Using Ethical Principles in Environmental Field Research with Place-Based Communities.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Apr;25(2):477-517. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9981-4. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
7
Health-related disparities: influence of environmental factors.
Med Clin North Am. 2005 Jul;89(4):721-38. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2005.02.001.
8
Commitment of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences to community-based participatory research for rural health.
Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Jun;109 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):469-73. doi: 10.1289/ehp.109-1240567.
9
Toxicogenomics through the eyes of informatics: conference overview and recommendations.
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 May;112(7):805-7. doi: 10.1289/ehp.112-1241996.
10
Social Science Collaboration with Environmental Health.
Environ Health Perspect. 2015 Nov;123(11):1100-6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409283. Epub 2015 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical Concerns About Human Genetic Enhancement in the Malay Science Fiction Novels.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Feb;24(1):109-127. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9887-1. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
4
The routinisation of genomics and genetics: implications for ethical practices.
J Med Ethics. 2006 Nov;32(11):635-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013532.
5
Investments in cancer genomics: who benefits and who decides.
Am J Public Health. 2006 Nov;96(11):1960-4. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.075424. Epub 2006 Oct 3.
6
Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.
Am J Med Genet A. 2006 May 15;140(10):1033-40. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31195.

本文引用的文献

2
The racial genetics paradox in biomedical research and public health.
Public Health Rep. 2002 Sep-Oct;117(5):421-5. doi: 10.1093/phr/117.5.421.
3
Environmental genome project: focusing on differences to understand the whole.
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Dec;110(12):A757-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.110-1241127.
4
Toxicogenomics: an emerging discipline.
Environ Health Perspect. 2002 Dec;110(12):A750-5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.110-a750.
5
Why genes don't count (for racial differences in health).
Am J Public Health. 2000 Nov;90(11):1699-702. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1699.
6
Involving study populations in the review of genetic research.
J Law Med Ethics. 2000 Spring;28(1):41-51, 3. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00315.x.
7
The environmental genome project: ethical, legal, and social implications.
Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Apr;108(4):279-81. doi: 10.1289/ehp.00108279.
8
Whose genes are they? The Human Genome Diversity Project.
J Health Soc Policy. 1999;10(4):51-66. doi: 10.1300/J045v10n04_04.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验