• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.研究报告中的基因研究结果:美国国立心肺血液研究所工作组的总结与建议
Am J Med Genet A. 2006 May 15;140(10):1033-40. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31195.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Recommendations from the EGAPP Working Group: genomic profiling to assess cardiovascular risk to improve cardiovascular health.EGAPP 工作组的建议:基因谱分析评估心血管风险,以改善心血管健康。
Genet Med. 2010 Dec;12(12):839-43. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181f872c0.
4
Disclosure of research results in genetic studies of Parkinson's disease caused by LRRK2 mutations.由LRRK2突变引起的帕金森病基因研究中的研究结果披露。
Mov Disord. 2015 Jun;30(7):904-8. doi: 10.1002/mds.26250. Epub 2015 May 7.
5
Advancing the science of myocardial recovery with mechanical circulatory support: A Working Group of the National, Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.用机械循环支持推进心肌恢复的科学:美国国立心肺血液研究所工作组。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jul;154(1):165-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.033. Epub 2017 Mar 19.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
8
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
9
Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.人类辅助生殖后的妊娠结局
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Jan;36(1):64-83. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30685-X.
10
Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.向研究参与者报告基因研究结果的伦理与实践指南:美国国立心肺血液研究所工作组的更新指南
Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2010 Dec;3(6):574-80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.110.958827.

引用本文的文献

1
Nephrologists' Views on a Workflow for Returning Genetic Results to Research Participants.肾脏病专家对向研究参与者反馈基因检测结果工作流程的看法。
Kidney Int Rep. 2024 Sep 2;9(11):3278-3289. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2024.08.026. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of Gene-Environment Interaction Research.基因-环境相互作用研究的伦理、法律和社会影响
Genet Epidemiol. 2025 Jan;49(1):e22591. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22591. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
3
Research participant perceptions of personal utility in disclosure of individual research results from genomic analysis.研究参与者对基因组分析个体研究结果披露中个人效用的认知。
J Community Genet. 2024 Oct;15(5):529-538. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00734-7. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
4
Assessment of the Needs of Nephrology Divisions to Implement Return of Clinically Significant Research Genetic Results: A Survey of Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE) Investigators.评估肾脏病科实施具有临床意义的研究性基因检测结果反馈的需求:肾病综合征研究网络(NEPTUNE)研究者调查
Glomerular Dis. 2023 Aug 21;3(1):178-188. doi: 10.1159/000533501. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
5
Return of Results in Genomic Research Using Large-Scale or Whole Genome Sequencing: Toward a New Normal.使用大规模或全基因组测序进行基因组研究的结果回报:迈向新常态。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2023 Aug 25;24:393-414. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-101122-103209. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
6
Guideline for feedback of individual genetic research findings for genomics research in Africa.非洲基因组学研究中个体遗传研究结果反馈指南。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jan;7(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007184.
7
To disclose, or not to disclose? Perspectives of clinical genomics professionals toward returning incidental findings from genomic research.是否披露?临床基因组学专业人员对从基因组研究中返还偶然发现的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jul 27;22(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00670-y.
8
A FAUSTIAN BARGAIN THAT UNDERMINES RESEARCH PARTICIPANTS' PRIVACY RIGHTS AND RETURN OF RESULTS.一项破坏研究参与者隐私权和结果反馈的浮士德式交易。
Fla Law Rev. 2019 Sep;71(5):1281-1345.
9
THE GENETIC INFORMATION NONDISCRIMINATION ACT AT AGE 10: GINA'S CONTROVERSIAL ASSERTION THAT DATA TRANSPARENCY PROTECTS PRIVACY AND CIVIL RIGHTS.《遗传信息非歧视法案》颁布10周年:基因信息非歧视法案关于数据透明度保护隐私和公民权利的争议性主张
William Mary Law Rev. 2019;60(6):2017-2109.
10
Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) in Clinical Genetics Research.临床遗传学研究中的伦理、法律和社会问题 (ELSI)。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:65-82. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_5.

本文引用的文献

1
Genetic association studies of complex traits: design and analysis issues.复杂性状的基因关联研究:设计与分析问题
Mutat Res. 2005 Jun 3;573(1-2):54-69. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2005.01.006.
2
Genetic information leaflets: influencing attitudes towards genetic testing.
Genet Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;6(4):219-25. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000132685.60259.ea.
3
Alzheimer's disease and testing.阿尔茨海默病与检测
Genet Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;6(4):173-4. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000134290.75409.d1.
4
Genetic testing: hope or hype?基因检测:希望还是炒作?
Genet Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;6(4):165-72. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000132683.24854.44.
5
Informed consent and biobanks: a population-based study of attitudes towards tissue donation for genetic research.知情同意与生物样本库:一项基于人群的对基因研究组织捐赠态度的研究。
Scand J Public Health. 2004;32(3):224-9. doi: 10.1080/14034940310019506.
6
Human genetics, environment, and communities of color: ethical and social implications.人类遗传学、环境与有色人种群体:伦理与社会影响
Environ Health Perspect. 2004 May;112(6):740-5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6731.
7
Considerations and costs of disclosing study findings to research participants.向研究参与者披露研究结果的考量与成本。
CMAJ. 2004 Apr 27;170(9):1417-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1031668.
8
Oncology physician and nurse practices and attitudes regarding offering clinical trial results to study participants.肿瘤内科医生和护士在向研究参与者提供临床试验结果方面的做法和态度。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Apr 21;96(8):629-32. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh096.
9
10 most commonly asked questions about genetic testing.
Neurologist. 2004 Mar;10(2):107-9. doi: 10.1097/01.nrl.0000117825.93281.96.
10
Predictive genetic testing in urology: ethical and social issues.泌尿外科中的预测性基因检测:伦理与社会问题
World J Urol. 2004 Feb;21(6):433-7. doi: 10.1007/s00345-003-0376-6. Epub 2003 Dec 23.

研究报告中的基因研究结果:美国国立心肺血液研究所工作组的总结与建议

Reporting genetic results in research studies: summary and recommendations of an NHLBI working group.

作者信息

Bookman Ebony B, Langehorne Aleisha A, Eckfeldt John H, Glass Kathleen C, Jarvik Gail P, Klag Michael, Koski Greg, Motulsky Arno, Wilfond Benjamin, Manolio Teri A, Fabsitz Richard R, Luepker Russell V

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7934, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med Genet A. 2006 May 15;140(10):1033-40. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31195.

DOI:10.1002/ajmg.a.31195
PMID:16575896
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2556074/
Abstract

Prospective epidemiologic studies aid in identifying genetic variants associated with diseases, health risks, and physiologic traits. These genetic variants may eventually be measured clinically for purposes of diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. As evidence of the potential clinical value of such information accrues, research studies face growing pressure to report these results to study participants or their physicians, even before sufficient evidence is available to support widespread screening of asymptomatic persons. There is thus a need to begin to develop consensus on whether and when genetic findings should be reported to participants in research studies. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) convened a Working Group on Reporting Genetic Results in Research Studies to discuss if, when, and how genetic information should be reported to study participants. The Working Group concluded that genetic test results should be reported to study participants when the associated risk for the disease is significant; the disease has important health implications such as premature death or substantial morbidity or has significant reproductive implications; and proven therapeutic or preventive interventions are available. Finally, the Working Group recommended procedures for reporting genetic research results and encouraged increased efforts to create uniform guidelines for this activity.

摘要

前瞻性流行病学研究有助于识别与疾病、健康风险和生理特征相关的基因变异。这些基因变异最终可能会用于临床诊断、预后评估和治疗。随着此类信息潜在临床价值的证据不断积累,研究面临着越来越大的压力,即便在尚无足够证据支持对无症状人群进行广泛筛查之前,也要将这些结果报告给研究参与者或他们的医生。因此,有必要就基因研究结果是否以及何时应报告给研究参与者开始形成共识。美国国立心肺血液研究所(NHLBI)召集了一个研究报告基因结果工作组,以讨论是否、何时以及如何向研究参与者报告基因信息。工作组得出结论,当疾病的相关风险显著、疾病具有重要的健康影响(如过早死亡或严重发病)或具有重大生殖影响,且有经过验证的治疗或预防干预措施时,基因检测结果应报告给研究参与者。最后,工作组推荐了报告基因研究结果的程序,并鼓励加大力度为此类活动制定统一指南。