Management of blunt thoracic aortic injuries: endovascular stents versus open repair.

BACKGROUND

Endovascular stent graft (EV) technology has been successfully adapted to the repair of blunt traumatic aortic injuries. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients treated with EV repair and open repair after blunt thoracic aortic trauma.

METHODS

A review of a tertiary trauma center's prospective trauma registry identified all patients who suffered a blunt traumatic thoracic aortic injury over an 11-year period (1991-2002). Operative interventions and outcomes were then compared.

RESULTS

Over an 11-year period, 18 patients underwent repair of a blunt thoracic aortic injury (EV, 6; open, 12). There were no significant differences in demographics, injury, or crash statistics between groups. The open group had a 17% early mortality rate (n = 2), a paraplegia rate of 16% (n = 2), and an 8.3% incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (n = 1). This is in contrast to a 0% rate of mortality, paraplegia, and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in the EV group. A definite trend toward decreased morbidity, mortality, intensive care unit length of stay, and number of ventilator-dependent days was seen with EV repair.

CONCLUSION

We observed a clear trend toward improved outcomes after EV repair of thoracic aortic injuries compared with standard open repair. EV repair is emerging as the preferred method of repairing blunt thoracic aortic injuries in trauma patients with multiple injuries.