Yarrow Kielan, Haggard Patrick, Rothwell John C
Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, U.C.L., London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Conscious Cogn. 2004 Jun;13(2):373-90. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2003.10.006.
Saccadic chronostasis refers to the subjective temporal lengthening of the first visual stimulus perceived after an eye movement. It has been quantified using a duration discrimination task. Most models of human duration discrimination hypothesise an internal clock. These models could explain chronostasis as a transient increase in internal clock speed due to arousal following a saccade, leading to temporal overestimation. Two experiments are described which addressed this hypothesis by parametrically varying the duration of the stimuli that are being judged. Changes in internal clock speed predict chronostasis effects proportional to stimulus duration. No evidence for proportionality was found. Two further experiments assessed the appropriateness of the control conditions employed. Results indicated that the chronostasis effect is constant across a wide range of stimulus durations and does not reflect the pattern of visual stimulation experienced during a saccade, suggesting that arousal is not critical. Instead, alternative processes, such as one affecting the onset of timing (i.e., the time of internal clock switch closure) are implicated. Further research is required to select between these alternatives.
扫视性时间错估是指眼球运动后所感知到的第一个视觉刺激在主观上的时间延长。它已通过持续时间辨别任务进行了量化。大多数人类持续时间辨别的模型都假设存在一个内部时钟。这些模型可以将时间错估解释为由于扫视后的唤醒导致内部时钟速度的短暂增加,从而导致时间高估。本文描述了两个实验,通过参数化改变被判断刺激的持续时间来验证这一假设。内部时钟速度的变化预测的时间错估效应与刺激持续时间成正比。但未发现成正比的证据。另外两个实验评估了所采用的控制条件的适当性。结果表明,时间错估效应在广泛的刺激持续时间范围内是恒定的,并且不反映扫视过程中所经历的视觉刺激模式,这表明唤醒并非关键因素。相反,涉及其他过程,例如一个影响计时开始(即内部时钟开关闭合的时间)的过程。需要进一步的研究来在这些替代方案中做出选择。