Meglecz Emese, Petenian Frederic, Danchin Etienne, D'Acier Armelle Coeur, Rasplus Jean-Yves, Faure Eric
Evolutionary Systematics Laboratory, CASE 5, UPRES Biodiversité 2202, Université de Provence, 3 place Victor Hugo, F-13331, Marseille Cedex 3, France.
Mol Ecol. 2004 Jun;13(6):1693-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02163.x.
Microsatellite flanking regions have been compared in two butterfly species. Several microsatellite flanking regions showed high similarity to one another among different microsatellites within a same species, but very few similarities were found between species. This can be the consequence of either duplication/multiplication events involving large regions containing microsatellites or of microsatellites imbedded in minisatellite regions. The multiplication of microsatellites might also be linked to mobile elements. Furthermore, crossing over between nonhomologous microsatellites can lead to the exchange of the flanking regions between microsatellites. The same phenomenon was observed in both studied butterfly species but not in Aphis fabae (Hemiptera), which was screened at the same time using the same protocol. These findings might explain, at least partially, why microsatellite isolation in Lepidoptera has been relatively unsuccessful so far.
对两种蝴蝶的微卫星侧翼区域进行了比较。在同一物种的不同微卫星之间,几个微卫星侧翼区域彼此显示出高度相似性,但在不同物种之间发现的相似性很少。这可能是涉及包含微卫星的大片段区域的重复/倍增事件的结果,也可能是嵌入小卫星区域的微卫星的结果。微卫星的倍增也可能与移动元件有关。此外,非同源微卫星之间的交叉会导致微卫星之间侧翼区域的交换。在两种被研究的蝴蝶物种中都观察到了相同的现象,但在同时使用相同方案进行筛选的豌豆蚜(半翅目)中没有观察到。这些发现可能至少部分解释了为什么到目前为止鳞翅目微卫星的分离相对不太成功。