Shaw Megan L, García-Sastre Adolfo, Palese Peter, Basler Christopher F
Department of Microbiology, Box 1124, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Pl., New York, NY 10029, USA.
J Virol. 2004 Jun;78(11):5633-41. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.11.5633-5641.2004.
In previous reports it was demonstrated that the Nipah virus V and W proteins have interferon (IFN) antagonist activity due to their ability to block signaling from the IFN-alpha/beta receptor (J. J. Rodriguez, J. P. Parisien, and C. M. Horvath, J. Virol. 76:11476-11483, 2002; M. S. Park et al., J. Virol. 77:1501-1511, 2003). The V, W, and P proteins are all encoded by the same viral gene and share an identical 407-amino-acid N-terminal region but have distinct C-terminal sequences. We now show that the P protein also has anti-IFN function, confirming that the common N-terminal domain is responsible for the antagonist activity. Truncation of this N-terminal domain revealed that amino acids 50 to 150 retain the ability to block IFN and to bind STAT1, a key component of the IFN signaling pathway. Subcellular localization studies demonstrate that the V and P proteins are predominantly cytoplasmic whereas the W protein is localized to the nucleus. In all cases, STAT1 colocalizes with the corresponding Nipah virus protein. These interactions are sufficient to inhibit STAT1 activation, as demonstrated by the lack of STAT1 phosphorylation on tyrosine 701 in IFN-stimulated cells expressing P, V, or W. Therefore, despite their common STAT1-binding domain, the Nipah virus V and P proteins act by retaining STAT1 in the cytoplasm while the W protein sequesters STAT1 in the nucleus, creating both a cytoplasmic and a nuclear block for STAT1. We also show that the IFN antagonist activity of the P protein is not as strong as that of V or W, perhaps explaining why Nipah virus has evolved to express these two edited products.
在先前的报告中已证明,尼帕病毒的V蛋白和W蛋白具有干扰素(IFN)拮抗活性,因为它们能够阻断来自IFN-α/β受体的信号传导(J. J. Rodriguez、J. P. Parisien和C. M. Horvath,《病毒学杂志》76:11476 - 11483,2002年;M. S. Park等人,《病毒学杂志》77:1501 - 1511,2003年)。V蛋白、W蛋白和P蛋白均由同一病毒基因编码,共享相同的407个氨基酸的N端区域,但具有不同的C端序列。我们现在表明,P蛋白也具有抗IFN功能,证实了共同的N端结构域负责拮抗活性。该N端结构域的截短显示,氨基酸50至150保留了阻断IFN和结合STAT1的能力,STAT1是IFN信号通路的关键成分。亚细胞定位研究表明,V蛋白和P蛋白主要定位于细胞质,而W蛋白定位于细胞核。在所有情况下,STAT1都与相应的尼帕病毒蛋白共定位。这些相互作用足以抑制STAT1的激活,如在表达P、V或W的IFN刺激细胞中酪氨酸701处缺乏STAT1磷酸化所证明的那样。因此,尽管尼帕病毒的V蛋白和P蛋白具有共同的STAT1结合结构域,但它们的作用方式是将STAT1保留在细胞质中,而W蛋白则将STAT1隔离在细胞核中,从而对STAT1形成细胞质和细胞核双重阻断。我们还表明,P蛋白的IFN拮抗活性不如V蛋白或W蛋白强,这或许可以解释为什么尼帕病毒进化出表达这两种编辑产物。