Philip J, Silver R K, Wilson R D, Thom E A, Zachary J M, Mohide P, Mahoney M J, Simpson J L, Platt L D, Pergament E, Hershey D, Filkins K, Johnson A, Shulman L P, Bang J, MacGregor S, Smith J R, Shaw D, Wapner R J, Jackson L G
Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun;103(6):1164-73. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000128049.73556.fb.
To assess, in a randomized trial, the safety and accuracy of amniocentesis and transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (CVS) performed at 11-14 weeks of gestation, given that this time frame is increasingly relevant to early trisomy screening.
We compared amniocentesis with CVS from 77 to 104 days of gestation in a randomized trial in a predominantly advanced maternal age population. Before randomization, the feasibility of both procedures was confirmed by ultrasonography, and experienced operators performed sampling under ultrasound guidance; conventional cytogenetic analysis was employed. The primary outcome measure was a composite of fetal loss plus preterm delivery before 28 weeks of gestation in cytogenetically normal pregnancies.
We randomized 3,775 women into 2 groups (1,914 to CVS; 1,861 to amniocentesis), which were comparable at baseline. More than 99.6% had the assigned procedure, and 99.9% were followed through delivery. In contrast to previous thinking, in the cytogenetically normal cohort (n = 3,698), no difference in primary study outcome was observed: 2.1% (95% confidence interval 1.5, 2.8) for CVS and 2.3% (95% confidence interval, 1.7, 3.1) for amniocentesis. However, spontaneous losses before 20 weeks and procedure-related, indicated terminations combined were increased in the amniocentesis group (P =.07, relative risk 1.74). We found a 4-fold increase in the rate of talipes equinovarus after amniocentesis (P =.02) overall and in week 13 (P =.03, relative risk = 4.65), but data were insufficient to determine this risk in week 14.
Amniocentesis at 13 weeks carries a significantly increased risk of talipes equinovarus compared with CVS and also suggests an increase in early, unintended pregnancy loss.
I
鉴于11 - 14周妊娠这个时间段与早期三体筛查的相关性日益增加,在一项随机试验中评估该孕周进行羊膜穿刺术和经腹绒毛取样(CVS)的安全性和准确性。
在一项以高龄产妇为主的随机试验中,我们比较了妊娠77至104天的羊膜穿刺术和CVS。随机分组前,通过超声检查确认两种操作的可行性,由经验丰富的操作人员在超声引导下进行取样;采用传统细胞遗传学分析。主要结局指标是细胞遗传学正常妊娠中胎儿丢失加妊娠28周前早产的综合情况。
我们将3775名女性随机分为两组(1914名接受CVS;1861名接受羊膜穿刺术),两组在基线时具有可比性。超过99.6%的女性接受了指定的操作,99.9%的女性随访至分娩。与以往观点相反,在细胞遗传学正常队列(n = 3698)中,未观察到主要研究结局的差异:CVS组为2.1%(95%置信区间1.5,2.8),羊膜穿刺术组为2.3%(95%置信区间,1.7,3.1)。然而,羊膜穿刺术组妊娠20周前的自然流产以及与操作相关的、表明为终止妊娠的情况合计有所增加(P = 0.07,相对风险1.74)。我们发现羊膜穿刺术后马蹄内翻足的发生率总体增加了4倍(P = 0.02),在第13周时增加(P = 0.03,相对风险 = 4.65),但数据不足以确定第14周时的这种风险。
与CVS相比,13周时进行羊膜穿刺术导致马蹄内翻足的风险显著增加,并且还提示早期意外妊娠丢失有所增加。
I