Suppr超能文献

在大幅度眼睛和头部注视转移后违反利斯廷定律的情况。

Violations of Listing's law after large eye and head gaze shifts.

作者信息

Glenn B, Vilis T

机构信息

Department of Physiology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

出版信息

J Neurophysiol. 1992 Jul;68(1):309-18. doi: 10.1152/jn.1992.68.1.309.

Abstract
  1. Kinematic constraints were examined in static eye and head positions after large gaze shifts to visual targets. Three-dimensional eye and head rotations were measured in six adult human subjects by the use of the magnetic field search coil technique. 2. Eye positions in space were found to obey Donder's law; i.e., for any given gaze direction there was a unique three-dimensional orientation. In other words, angular eye positions in space (expressed as quaternions) were constrained to a two-dimensional surface. 3. When only the eye moved (head stationary), the shape of this surface resembled a plane and thus the eye position in space obeyed Listing's law. However, after gaze shifts involving both the eye and the head, the eye in space surface became twisted and thus nonplanar. This twist was similar to that achieved by a Fick gimbal model of rotations in which the horizontal axis is nested within a fixed vertical axis. During oblique gaze shifts, the head made predominantly horizontal movements whereas the eye made predominantly vertical movements. This, combined with the fact that the eye is mounted within the head, causes the eye in space surface to resemble that of a Fick gimbal. 4. The angular position of the head in space was also constrained to a two-dimensional surface. This surface was also not planar (Listinglike) and twisted in a manner similar to that of the eye in space. 5. Whereas the angular position of the eye in head was found to obey Listing's law after head-fixed gaze shifts, violations of Listing's law occurred after head-free gaze shifts. These violations showed significant intersubject variation in their magnitude and character. 6. Given that the eye in space violates Listing's law after head movements, the supposition that Listing's law serves the perceptual purpose of maintaining radial constancy is untenable. The Fick gimballike behavior of the head in space and eye in space may hold several advantages over a Listing's system. When the head in space behaves like a Fick gimbal, a horizontal line through the eyes remains parallel to the horizon. By having the eye in space behave like a Fick gimbal, the work done against gravity may be minimized by having the eye contribute more to vertical gaze shifts than does the head.
摘要
  1. 在向视觉目标进行大的注视转移后,对静态眼睛和头部位置的运动学约束进行了研究。通过使用磁场搜索线圈技术,在六名成年人类受试者中测量了三维眼睛和头部旋转。2. 发现空间中的眼睛位置遵循东德定律;即,对于任何给定的注视方向,都有唯一的三维方向。换句话说,空间中的角眼位置(表示为四元数)被限制在一个二维表面上。3. 当只有眼睛移动(头部静止)时,这个表面的形状类似于一个平面,因此空间中的眼睛位置遵循利斯廷定律。然而,在涉及眼睛和头部的注视转移之后,空间中的眼睛表面变得扭曲,因此不是平面的。这种扭曲类似于通过菲克万向节旋转模型实现的扭曲,其中水平轴嵌套在固定的垂直轴内。在斜向注视转移期间,头部主要进行水平运动,而眼睛主要进行垂直运动。这与眼睛安装在头部内的事实相结合,导致空间中的眼睛表面类似于菲克万向节的表面。4. 头部在空间中的角位置也被限制在一个二维表面上。这个表面也不是平面的(类似利斯廷的),并且以类似于空间中眼睛的方式扭曲。5. 虽然在头部固定的注视转移后发现头部内眼睛的角位置遵循利斯廷定律,但在头部自由注视转移后出现了对利斯廷定律的违反。这些违反在其大小和特征上表现出显著的个体间差异。6. 鉴于头部运动后空间中的眼睛违反了利斯廷定律,认为利斯廷定律用于维持径向恒常性的感知目的这一假设是站不住脚的。空间中的头部和空间中的眼睛的菲克万向节状行为可能比利斯廷系统具有几个优点。当空间中的头部表现得像一个菲克万向节时,穿过眼睛的水平线保持与地平线平行。通过使空间中的眼睛表现得像一个菲克万向节,通过让眼睛比头部更多地参与垂直注视转移,可以使对抗重力所做的功最小化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验