Serido Joyce, Almeida David M, Wethington Elaine
Bronfrenbrenner Life Course Center, Department of Human Development, Cornell University, Surge 1, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
J Health Soc Behav. 2004 Mar;45(1):17-33. doi: 10.1177/002214650404500102.
Using daily telephone interviews of a U.S. national sample of adults, aged 25-74 (N = 1,031), the present analyses draw from theories of the stress process and recent research to examine how chronic role-related stressors and daily hassles affect psychological distress. Four separate hypotheses are examined. The first explores the association between chronic stressors and daily hassles. The second tests whether daily hassles function as an intervening variable between chronic stressors and psychological distress. The third tests whether a chronic stressor moderates the relationship between daily hassles and psychological distress. The fourth hypothesis tests for cross-domain effects of chronic stressors and daily hassles. Findings indicate that chronic stressors and daily hassles are distinct types of stressors with unique contributions to psychological distress. The study provides support for chronic home stressors functioning as a moderating factor on the relationship between daily hassles and psychological distress both within and across domains.
通过对年龄在25 - 74岁的1031名美国成年人全国样本进行每日电话访谈,本分析借鉴压力过程理论和近期研究,以检验与角色相关的慢性压力源和日常琐事如何影响心理困扰。研究了四个不同的假设。第一个假设探讨慢性压力源与日常琐事之间的关联。第二个假设检验日常琐事是否作为慢性压力源与心理困扰之间的中介变量。第三个假设检验慢性压力源是否调节日常琐事与心理困扰之间的关系。第四个假设检验慢性压力源和日常琐事的跨领域效应。研究结果表明,慢性压力源和日常琐事是不同类型的压力源,对心理困扰有独特的影响。该研究支持慢性家庭压力源在日常琐事与心理困扰之间的关系中,在领域内和跨领域都起到调节作用。