Suppr超能文献

[国际体力活动问卷(中文版,IPAQ)的信效度研究]

[Study on the reliability and validity of international physical activity questionnaire (Chinese Vision, IPAQ)].

作者信息

Qu Ning-ning, Li Ke-ji

机构信息

Institute of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100083, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2004 Mar;25(3):265-8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the reliability and validity of Chinese version of International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) and to provide an instrument for physical activity measurement in Chinese-spoken population.

METHODS

Test-retest reliability was systemically assessed in 94 participants sampled from college students. Questionnaires were completed twice with a three-day interval. The validity was established in 39 volunteers by Caltrac accelerometer monitoring and 24-hour activity recording for seven consecutive days.

RESULTS

Both long vision (LV) and short vision (SV) had intraclass correlation coefficients above 0.7 for physical activity. The total energy expenditure measured by LV, SV and PA records were 264.5 +/- 260.9, 185.4 +/- 128.9 (compared with activity records, P < 0.05) and 250.5 +/- 141.2 MET-min/d respectively. Energy expenditure of moderate physical activity were 81.7 +/- 165.4, 32.0 +/- 42.5 (compared with activity record, P < 0.05) and 61.3 +/- 72.0 MET-min/d. Caltrac accelerometer was moderately correlated with LV (r = 0.50) and SV (r = 0.63) while SV measured total daily energy expenditure was lower than activity records. When participants were categorized into two groups according to their time spent in physical activity above or below the target level, proportions of agreement of questionnaires and 24-hour activity records were high, including vigorous physical activity above 90% and moderate physical activity above 70%. LV, SV and activity records were measured during sedentary condition at an approximate level.

CONCLUSIONS

Both LV and SV of IPAQ appeared to have acceptable reliability and validity, compared to other physical activity instruments that were used in various large epidemiological studies. The total or physical energy expenditures were similar between LV and activity records. For activity levels, the proportion of agreement were similar between activity records and LV or SV. However, SV underestimated the energy expenditure of total and moderate physical activity.

摘要

目的

研究中文版国际体力活动问卷(IPAQ)的信度和效度,为华语人群的体力活动测量提供工具。

方法

对94名大学生进行系统的重测信度评估。问卷分两次填写,间隔三天。通过Caltrac加速度计监测和连续七天的24小时活动记录,对39名志愿者进行效度评估。

结果

长问卷(LV)和短问卷(SV)在体力活动方面的组内相关系数均高于0.7。LV、SV和体力活动记录测量的总能量消耗分别为264.5±260.9、185.4±128.9(与活动记录相比,P<0.05)和250.5±141.2梅脱-分钟/天。中等强度体力活动的能量消耗分别为81.7±165.4、32.0±42.5(与活动记录相比,P<0.05)和61.3±72.0梅脱-分钟/天。Caltrac加速度计与LV(r = 0.50)和SV(r = 0.63)中度相关,而SV测量的每日总能量消耗低于活动记录。当根据参与者在体力活动中高于或低于目标水平的时间分为两组时,问卷与24小时活动记录的一致性比例较高,包括剧烈体力活动高于90%和中等强度体力活动高于70%。LV、SV和活动记录在久坐状态下的测量水平相近。

结论

与其他用于各种大型流行病学研究的体力活动工具相比,IPAQ的LV和SV似乎具有可接受的信度和效度。LV与活动记录的总能量或体力能量消耗相似。对于活动水平,活动记录与LV或SV之间的一致性比例相似。然而,SV低估了总体力活动和中等强度体力活动的能量消耗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验