Wang Mei-Lin, Petsonk Edward L
Division of Respiratory Disease Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Jun;46(6):591-5. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000128159.09520.2a.
Monitoring change in FEV1 (deltaFEV1) is useful for assessing adverse respiratory effects in an individual, but high variability impedes reliable recognition of accelerated decline. The American Thoracic Society (ATS) recommends a > or =15% year-to-year FEV1 decline for clinical significance. To evaluate the applicability of this criterion in health monitoring programs, we examined the mean, lower 5th percentile, and lower 5% cutoff value of deltaFEV1 determined from 2 tests at 6- and 12-month intervals using data obtained with ATS-recommended equipment and procedures in 389 white male workers, each with 3 to 11 spirometry tests over 5 years. Results indicate that when healthy working males perform spirometry according to ATS standards, a yearly decline in FEV1 greater than 8% or 330 mL should not be considered normal, whereas the 15% ATS criterion could be appropriate in clinical settings.
监测第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)的变化(△FEV1)有助于评估个体的不良呼吸效应,但高变异性阻碍了对加速下降的可靠识别。美国胸科学会(ATS)建议FEV1年下降≥15%具有临床意义。为评估该标准在健康监测项目中的适用性,我们使用ATS推荐的设备和程序,对389名白人男性工人进行了研究,这些工人在5年中每人进行了3至11次肺量计测试,每6个月和12个月进行2次测试,以确定△FEV1的均值、第5百分位数下限和5%下限临界值。结果表明,当健康男性工人按照ATS标准进行肺量计测试时,FEV1年下降大于8%或330 mL不应视为正常,而ATS的15%标准在临床环境中可能是合适的。