• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜辅助经裂孔远端食管癌切除术

Laparoscopically assisted transhiatal resection for malignancies of the distal esophagus.

作者信息

Van den Broek W T, Makay O, Berends F J, Yuan J Z, Houdijk A P J, Meijer S, Cuesta M A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, VU Medisch Centrum, Postbus 7057, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2004 May;18(5):812-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9173-y. Epub 2004 Apr 6.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-003-9173-y
PMID:15216864
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Resection of the esophagus remains the only curative therapy for esophageal cancer. Conventional resections are right-side thoracotomy in combination with laparotomy, gastric tube creation, and the transhiatal approach according to Orringer. This study evaluated laparoscopically assisted transhiatal esophagus resection, which offers perfect visualization of the esophagus during mediastinal dissection without the necessity of a thoracotomy.

METHODS

In this study, 25 laparoscopically assisted transhiatal esophagus resections were compared with a historical control group consisting of 20 open transhiatal esophagus resections.

RESULTS

Nine laparoscopically assisted resections (36%) were converted to open procedures. The operating time was longer in the laparoscopically assisted group (300 vs 257 min; p < 0.05), but laparoscopically assisted esophagus resection was associated with less blood loss (600 vs 900 ml; p < 0.05) and shorter intensive care unit stay (1 vs 2 days; p < 0.05). There were no differences in morbidity, mortality, and hospital stay. During a shorter follow-up time for the laparoscopic group (17 vs 54 months), 11 patients (44%) in the laparoscopically assisted group and 10 (50%) patients in the open group had recurrence of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopically assisted transhiatal esophagus resection is a safe procedure with important advantages, as compared with the open procedure, such as less blood loss and shorter intensive care unit stay. At this point, the oncologic consequences are not clear.

摘要

背景

食管切除术仍然是食管癌唯一的根治性治疗方法。传统的切除术是右侧开胸联合剖腹术、胃管制作以及根据奥林格方法进行的经裂孔途径。本研究评估了腹腔镜辅助经裂孔食管切除术,该方法在纵隔解剖过程中能提供食管的完美视野,且无需开胸。

方法

在本研究中,将25例腹腔镜辅助经裂孔食管切除术与由20例开放经裂孔食管切除术组成的历史对照组进行比较。

结果

9例腹腔镜辅助切除术(36%)转为开放手术。腹腔镜辅助组的手术时间更长(300分钟对257分钟;p<0.05),但腹腔镜辅助食管切除术的失血量更少(600毫升对900毫升;p<0.05),重症监护病房住院时间更短(1天对2天;p<0.05)。在发病率、死亡率和住院时间方面没有差异。在腹腔镜组较短的随访时间(17个月对54个月)内,腹腔镜辅助组有11例患者(44%)疾病复发,开放组有10例患者(50%)疾病复发。

结论

与开放手术相比,腹腔镜辅助经裂孔食管切除术是一种安全的手术方法,具有重要优势,如失血量更少和重症监护病房住院时间更短。目前,肿瘤学方面的后果尚不清楚。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopically assisted transhiatal resection for malignancies of the distal esophagus.腹腔镜辅助经裂孔远端食管癌切除术
Surg Endosc. 2004 May;18(5):812-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9173-y. Epub 2004 Apr 6.
2
Anesthesiological hazards during laparoscopic transhiatal esophageal resection: a case control study of the laparoscopic-assisted vs the conventional approach.腹腔镜经裂孔食管切除术的麻醉风险:腹腔镜辅助与传统手术方法的病例对照研究
Surg Endosc. 2004 Aug;18(8):1263-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9176-8. Epub 2004 May 28.
3
Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience.机器人辅助经食管裂孔食管切除术:3 年单中心经验。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Feb-Mar;26(2):159-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01325.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
4
Video-assisted mediastinoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy combined with laparoscopy for esophageal cancer.电视辅助纵隔镜经裂孔食管癌切除术联合腹腔镜治疗食管癌
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 Dec 31;5:132. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-5-132.
5
Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal esophagectomy for distal and junction cancer.腹腔镜与开放经食管裂孔食管癌切除术治疗远端和交界部癌症。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2012 Apr;104(4):197-202. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082012000400005.
6
Video-assisted laparoscopic resection of the esophagus for carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy.新辅助治疗后食管癌的电视辅助腹腔镜食管切除术
Hepatogastroenterology. 2009 Jul-Aug;56(93):1035-8.
7
Outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophago-gastric junction.腹腔镜辅助经胸食管切除术治疗食管和食管胃交界腺癌的结果。
Dis Esophagus. 2011 Aug;24(6):430-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01165.x. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic inversion esophagectomy and open transhiatal esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia and stage I esophageal adenocarcinoma.腹腔镜翻转食管切除术与开放经裂孔食管切除术治疗高级别异型增生和Ⅰ期食管腺癌的比较
Arch Surg. 2009 Jul;144(7):679-84. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.113.
9
Laparoscopic versus open gastroplasty in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparative study.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006 Apr;16(2):63-7. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200604000-00001.
10
Immunological consequences of laparoscopic versus open transhiatal resection for malignancies of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.腹腔镜与开放经裂孔切除术治疗远端食管癌和胃食管交界部恶性肿瘤的免疫后果
Dig Surg. 2008;25(2):140-7. doi: 10.1159/000128171. Epub 2008 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy.微创与机器人辅助食管切除术的对比结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):814-820. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06834-7. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
2
Liver Function, Quantified by LiMAx Test, After Major Abdominal Surgery. Comparison Between Open and Laparoscopic Approach.大腹部手术后通过LiMAx试验量化的肝功能。开放手术与腹腔镜手术方法的比较。
World J Surg. 2018 Feb;42(2):557-566. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4170-9.
3
Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the oesophagus; with special reference to a new operation for growths of the middle third.食管癌的外科治疗;特别提及针对中段三分之一处肿瘤的一种新手术
Br J Surg. 1946 Jul;34:18-31. doi: 10.1002/bjs.18003413304.
2
Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.食管腺癌扩大经胸切除术与有限经裂孔切除术的比较
N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 21;347(21):1662-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa022343.
3
Curative resection for esophageal adenocarcinoma: analysis of 100 en bloc esophagectomies.
微创食管切除术与开放食管切除术治疗可切除食管癌的Meta分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec 8;14(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1062-7.
4
Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.腹腔镜与开放经裂孔食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD011390. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011390.pub2.
5
Is minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.微创食管切除术对预防癌症食管切除术后吻合口漏是否有效?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep 4;13:269. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0661-z.
6
Superiority of Minimally Invasive Oesophagectomy in Reducing In-Hospital Mortality of Patients with Resectable Oesophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.微创食管切除术在降低可切除食管癌患者院内死亡率方面的优越性:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 21;10(7):e0132889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132889. eCollection 2015.
7
Outcomes following laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.腹腔镜经裂孔食管癌切除术的术后结果。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):492-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3230-y. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
8
Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open surgery: is there an advantage?微创食管切除术与开放手术:是否有优势?
Surg Endosc. 2013 Mar;27(3):724-31. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2546-3. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
9
Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review.微创食管切除术(MIE)是否能提供与开放技术相当的肿瘤学结果?一项系统评价。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Mar;16(3):486-94. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1792-3. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
10
Thoracolaparoscopy in the lateral position for esophageal cancer: the experience of a single institution with 112 consecutive patients.侧卧位胸腹腔镜食管癌手术:单中心 112 例连续病例经验
Surg Endosc. 2010 Oct;24(10):2407-14. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0963-8. Epub 2010 Mar 5.
食管腺癌的根治性切除术:100例整块食管切除术分析
Ann Surg. 2001 Oct;234(4):520-30; discussion 530-1. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200110000-00011.
4
Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.微创Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Aug;72(2):593-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02261-x.
5
Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis.经胸与经腹食管切除术治疗食管癌:一项荟萃分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Jul;72(1):306-13. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)02570-4.
6
Skeletonizing en bloc esophagectomy for cancer.食管癌整块骨骼化切除术
Ann Surg. 2001 Jul;234(1):25-32. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200107000-00005.
7
Esophagectomy and laparoscopic gastric mobilization with minilaparotomy for tubulization and esophageal replacement.食管切除术及经小切口腹腔镜游离胃用于管状化和食管置换术。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Apr;11(2):119-25.
8
Minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Sep;70(3):906-11; discussion 911-2. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01711-2.
9
Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States.美国食管癌和胃癌发病率的变化趋势
Cancer. 1998 Nov 15;83(10):2049-53.
10
Endoscopic microsurgical dissection of the esophagus (EMDE).内镜下食管显微手术解剖(EMDE)。
Int Surg. 1997 Apr-Jun;82(2):109-12.