• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我控制、感知到的机会以及态度作为学术不诚实行为的预测因素。

Self-control, perceived opportunity, and attitudes as predictors of academic dishonesty.

作者信息

Bolin Aaron U

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Counseling, Box 1560, Arkansas State University, State University, AR 72467, USA.

出版信息

J Psychol. 2004 Mar;138(2):101-14. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.138.2.101-114.

DOI:10.3200/JRLP.138.2.101-114
PMID:15218783
Abstract

Academic dishonesty is a persistent and pervasive problem on college campuses. Researchers have suggested a variety of factors that influence academic dishonesty. The present study is an examination of the roles of self-control, attitude toward academic dishonesty, and perceived opportunity in predicting academic dishonesty. The dataset consisted of 853 survey responses from university students across the United States. The results showed that attitude toward academic dishonesty mediated the relationship between self-control and academic dishonesty and also between perceived opportunity and academic dishonesty. Implications of these findings are briefly discussed.

摘要

学术不诚实是大学校园里一个长期存在且普遍存在的问题。研究人员提出了多种影响学术不诚实的因素。本研究考察了自我控制、对学术不诚实的态度以及感知到的机会在预测学术不诚实方面所起的作用。数据集包含来自美国各地大学生的853份调查回复。结果表明,对学术不诚实的态度在自我控制与学术不诚实之间以及感知到的机会与学术不诚实之间起到了中介作用。这些研究结果的意义将被简要讨论。

相似文献

1
Self-control, perceived opportunity, and attitudes as predictors of academic dishonesty.自我控制、感知到的机会以及态度作为学术不诚实行为的预测因素。
J Psychol. 2004 Mar;138(2):101-14. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.138.2.101-114.
2
A multidiscipline exploration of college students' perceptions of academic dishonesty: are nursing students different from other college students?多学科视角下大学生对学术不端行为的认知:护理专业学生与其他大学生有何不同?
Nurse Educ Today. 2009 Oct;29(7):710-4. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.03.001. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
3
Academic dishonesty and attitudes towards academic dishonest acts: support for cognitive dissonance theory.学术不诚实及对学术不诚实行为的态度:对认知失调理论的支持
Psychol Rep. 2003 Feb;92(1):174-6. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2003.92.1.174.
4
Academic dishonesty among nursing students.护理学生中的学术不诚实行为。
J Nurs Educ. 2014 Feb;53(2):77-87. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20140122-06. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
5
Predictors of health behaviours in college students.大学生健康行为的预测因素。
J Adv Nurs. 2004 Dec;48(5):463-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03229.x.
6
Academic dishonesty among high school students.
Adolescence. 1999 Winter;34(136):681-7.
7
Are students' perceptions of parental acceptance of academic dishonesty associated with its occurrence?
Psychol Rep. 2003 Aug;93(1):93-7. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2003.93.1.93.
8
Conditional covariation of binge drinking with predictors of college students' cheating.
Psychol Rep. 2003 Dec;93(3 Pt 1):735-49. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2003.93.3.735.
9
The prevalence of academic dishonesty in Texas dental hygiene programs.德克萨斯州口腔卫生项目中学术不诚实行为的发生率。
J Dent Educ. 2008 Nov;72(11):1247-60.
10
Academic dishonesty and ethical reasoning: pharmacy and medical school students in New Zealand.学术不端与伦理推理:新西兰的药学与医学院学生
Med Teach. 2013 Jun;35(6):e1211-7. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.737962. Epub 2012 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Dark personality traits are associated with academic misconduct, frustration, negative thinking, and generative AI use habits: the case of Sichuan art universities.黑暗人格特质与学术不端行为、挫折感、消极思维以及生成式人工智能使用习惯相关:以四川艺术院校为例。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):633. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02949-w.
2
Validation of the academic misconduct questionnaire: exploring predictors of student misconduct.学术不端行为问卷的验证:探究学生行为不端的预测因素。
Med Educ Online. 2025 Dec;30(1):2506739. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2506739. Epub 2025 May 23.
3
Why Students Cheat and How Understanding This Can Help Reduce the Frequency of Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: A Literature Review.
学生作弊的原因以及理解这些原因如何有助于减少高等教育中学术不端行为的发生频率:一项文献综述
J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2022 Jun 1;20(2):A150-A160. doi: 10.59390/LXMJ2920. eCollection 2022 Winter.
4
Athletes' use of analgesics is related to doping attitudes, competitive anxiety, and situational opportunity.运动员使用镇痛药与兴奋剂态度、比赛焦虑和情境机会有关。
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Oct 18;4:849117. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.849117. eCollection 2022.
5
The relationship between just world belief and wellbeing, cheating behaviors, and academic work behaviors during COVID 19 among university students.新冠疫情期间大学生公正世界信念与幸福感、欺骗行为和学术工作行为之间的关系。
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 22;12(1):14328. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18045-7.
6
Does creative thinking contribute to the academic integrity of education students?创造性思维对教育专业学生的学术诚信有帮助吗?
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 4;13:925195. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925195. eCollection 2022.
7
Construction and Validation of the Research Misconduct Scale for Social Science University Students.社会科学专业大学生研究不端行为量表的构建与验证
Front Psychol. 2022 May 9;13:859466. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859466. eCollection 2022.
8
Social Learning, Self-Control, and Offending Specialization and Versatility among Friends.社会学习、自我控制与朋友间犯罪的专业化和多样性
Am J Crim Justice. 2019 Feb;44(1):3-22. doi: 10.1007/s12103-018-9445-7. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
9
Cheating behaviors and related factors at a Korean dental school.韩国一所牙科学校的作弊行为及相关因素。
Korean J Med Educ. 2019 Sep;31(3):239-249. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2019.134. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
10
Perceptions of acceptable conducts by university students.大学生对可接受行为的认知。
J Optom. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):166-74. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Mar 21.