Suppr超能文献

关于治疗腰痛药物疗效和安全性的临床试验综合综述。

A comprehensive review of clinical trials on the efficacy and safety of drugs for the treatment of low back pain.

作者信息

Schnitzer Thomas J, Ferraro Aimee, Hunsche Elke, Kong Sheldon X

机构信息

Office of Clinical Research and Training, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 Jul;28(1):72-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2003.10.015.

Abstract

A systematic review involving 50 randomized controlled trials (4,863 patients) published since 1980 was undertaken with the objective of assessing efficacy and safety of low back pain (LBP) medications. The methodological quality of each trial was evaluated based on a standardized system. Quality scores ranged from 26 to 82 points on a 100-point scale (from 0 to 100), indicating an overall moderate quality of the trials reviewed. Limited evidence was found regarding the effectiveness of drug treatments for LBP and current studies focused on short-term usage of the therapies. Available evidence supported the effectiveness of non-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in acute and chronic LBP, of muscle relaxants in acute LBP, and of antidepressants in chronic LBP; safety results were heterogeneous. More rigorously designed trials should be implemented to establish comparative efficacy and safety of drugs used to treat chronic and acute LBP.

摘要

开展了一项系统评价,纳入自1980年以来发表的50项随机对照试验(4863例患者),目的是评估腰痛(LBP)药物的疗效和安全性。根据一个标准化系统对每项试验的方法学质量进行评估。质量评分在100分制(从0到100)中从26分到82分不等,表明所审查试验的总体质量中等。关于LBP药物治疗有效性的证据有限,目前的研究集中在这些疗法的短期使用上。现有证据支持非选择性非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)对急性和慢性LBP有效,肌肉松弛剂对急性LBP有效,抗抑郁药对慢性LBP有效;安全性结果存在异质性。应开展设计更严谨的试验,以确定用于治疗慢性和急性LBP的药物的相对疗效和安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验