• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国国立精神卫生研究所惊恐问卷。一种评估惊恐障碍临床特征的工具。

The National Institute of Mental Health Panic Questionnaire. An instrument for assessing clinical characteristics of panic disorder.

作者信息

Scupi B S, Maser J D, Uhde T W

机构信息

Section on Anxiety and Affective Disorders, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

出版信息

J Nerv Ment Dis. 1992 Sep;180(9):566-72. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199209000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00005053-199209000-00004
PMID:1522405
Abstract

This paper introduces a new self-report inventory, the NIMH Panic Questionnaire (NIMH PQ), for obtaining and quantifying comprehensive information about the clinical characteristics of panic disorder in patients with previously diagnosed or suspected illness. Fifty-two patients who met DSM-III-R criteria for panic disorder completed the NIMH PQ; their responses were compared with data derived from 16 similar or identical questions on the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia modified for anxiety disorders. There were no significant differences between the two instruments on 15 of the 16 (93.7%) items tested. The one exception revealed a greater proportion of patients versus physicians endorsing "spontaneous" panic, and a nonsignificant trend for physicians over patients endorsing anticipatory anxiety with greater frequency. The NIMH PQ offers a potentially useful clinical and research tool in the assessment of patients with known or suspected panic disorder.

摘要

本文介绍了一种新的自陈式问卷——美国国立精神卫生研究所惊恐问卷(NIMH PQ),用于获取和量化有关先前已确诊或疑似患有惊恐障碍患者临床特征的全面信息。52名符合DSM-III-R惊恐障碍标准的患者完成了NIMH PQ;将他们的回答与从针对焦虑症修改后的情感障碍和精神分裂症量表中16个相似或相同问题得出的数据进行了比较。在测试的16项(93.7%)中有15项,两种工具之间没有显著差异。唯一的例外是,与医生相比,认可“自发”惊恐的患者比例更高,并且医生比患者更频繁认可预期性焦虑,但这一趋势不显著。NIMH PQ在评估已知或疑似惊恐障碍患者方面提供了一种潜在有用的临床和研究工具。

相似文献

1
The National Institute of Mental Health Panic Questionnaire. An instrument for assessing clinical characteristics of panic disorder.美国国立精神卫生研究所惊恐问卷。一种评估惊恐障碍临床特征的工具。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1992 Sep;180(9):566-72. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199209000-00004.
2
Does the Beck Anxiety Inventory measure anything beyond panic attack symptoms?贝克焦虑量表所测量的是否超出了惊恐发作症状的范畴?
Behav Res Ther. 1996 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):949-54; discussion 955-61. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(96)00037-x.
3
Rapid onset: a valid panic disorder criterion?起病急骤:一项有效的惊恐障碍标准?
Depress Anxiety. 1997;5(3):121-6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6394(1997)5:3<121::aid-da2>3.0.co;2-h.
4
Panic disorder and gastrointestinal symptoms: findings from the NIMH Epidemiologic Catchment Area project.惊恐障碍与胃肠道症状:美国国立精神卫生研究所流行病学集水区项目的研究结果
Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Jan;151(1):64-70. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.1.64.
5
Panic Disorder Severity Scale: reliability and validity of the Turkish version.惊恐障碍严重程度量表:土耳其语版本的信度和效度
Depress Anxiety. 2004;20(1):8-16. doi: 10.1002/da.20011.
6
Electrodermal activity in anxiety disorders.焦虑症中的皮肤电活动。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1993 Nov;88(5):350-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1993.tb03471.x.
7
Personality dimensions in panic disorder and generalized anxiety disorder.惊恐障碍和广泛性焦虑障碍中的人格维度。
J Affect Disord. 1996 Apr 12;37(2-3):75-9. doi: 10.1016/0165-0327(95)00058-5.
8
A new self-rating scale for depression and anxiety states based on the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale.一种基于综合精神病理学评定量表的新型抑郁和焦虑状态自评量表。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1994 Jan;89(1):21-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1994.tb01480.x.
9
Levels of "nonclinical panic".“非临床恐慌”水平
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;25(1):35-40. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90061-2.
10
Potential use of Internet-based screening for anxiety disorders: a pilot study.基于互联网的焦虑障碍筛查的潜在应用:一项试点研究。
Depress Anxiety. 2010 Nov;27(11):1006-10. doi: 10.1002/da.20723. Epub 2010 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Assessment and Management of Anxiety and Panic Disorders in Emergency Setting.急诊环境中焦虑和惊恐障碍评估与管理的临床实践指南
Indian J Psychiatry. 2023 Feb;65(2):181-185. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_489_22. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
2
Black patients with binge-eating disorder: Comparison of different assessment methods.患有暴饮暴食症的黑人患者:不同评估方法的比较。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Oct;28(10):1319-1324. doi: 10.1037/pas0000246. Epub 2015 Nov 16.