• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

起病急骤:一项有效的惊恐障碍标准?

Rapid onset: a valid panic disorder criterion?

作者信息

Scupi B S, Benson B E, Brown L B, Uhde T W

机构信息

Unit on Anxiety Disorders, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-1272, USA.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 1997;5(3):121-6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6394(1997)5:3<121::aid-da2>3.0.co;2-h.

DOI:10.1002/(sici)1520-6394(1997)5:3<121::aid-da2>3.0.co;2-h
PMID:9323451
Abstract

This study examined the value of the DSM-IV time criterion for panic disorder (PD) requiring an abrupt onset to panic attacks (PAs) with a time to peak intensity (TTPI) of less than 10 min, and evaluated features distinguishing rapid onset (TTPI < 10) from prolonged onset (TTPI > 10) panickers. Eight hundred and sixty-four respondents to the National Institute of Mental Health Panic Disorder Questionnaire (NIMH PQ) who met the first three PD criteria were compared based on the time criterion. The prolonged onset panickers (18.2%) did not differ significantly from rapid onset panickers (81.8%) on any of 100 items assessing clinical symptoms, course of illness, and comorbidity of PD. These results suggest that many patients with otherwise classic features of PD have a prolonged TTPI of PAs, and that patients with prolonged-onset PAs are similar to patients with rapid-onset PAs on most measures. The reliability, validity, and clinical relevance of the current DSM-IV TTPI criterion should be evaluated in future studies.

摘要

本研究考察了《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中恐慌症(PD)的时间标准的价值,该标准要求恐慌发作(PA)突然起病,且达到峰值强度的时间(TTPI)少于10分钟,并评估了区分快速起病(TTPI < 10)和缓慢起病(TTPI > 10)的恐慌症患者的特征。对符合前三项PD标准的864名美国国立精神卫生研究所恐慌症问卷(NIMH PQ)受访者,根据时间标准进行了比较。在评估PD临床症状、病程和共病情况的100个项目中的任何一项上,缓慢起病的恐慌症患者(18.2%)与快速起病的恐慌症患者(81.8%)均无显著差异。这些结果表明,许多具有典型PD特征的患者PA的TTPI较长,且在大多数指标上,缓慢起病的PA患者与快速起病的PA患者相似。当前DSM-IV的TTPI标准的可靠性、有效性和临床相关性应在未来研究中进行评估。

相似文献

1
Rapid onset: a valid panic disorder criterion?起病急骤:一项有效的惊恐障碍标准?
Depress Anxiety. 1997;5(3):121-6. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1520-6394(1997)5:3<121::aid-da2>3.0.co;2-h.
2
Further evidence for a broader concept of somatization disorder using the somatic symptom index.使用躯体症状指数对躯体化障碍更广泛概念的进一步证据。
Psychosomatics. 1995 May-Jun;36(3):285-94. doi: 10.1016/S0033-3182(95)71668-1.
3
[Rethink the panic disorder].重新审视惊恐障碍
Encephale. 2010 Apr;36(2):100-4. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2009.02.007. Epub 2009 Sep 11.
4
Comparison of RDC, DSM-III, DSM-III-R diagnostic criteria for generalized anxiety disorder.广泛性焦虑症的研究用诊断标准(RDC)、《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)及《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)诊断标准的比较
Anxiety. 1996;2(2):71-9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7154(1996)2:2<71::AID-ANXI2>3.0.CO;2-G.
5
Changes in mood, anxiety, and personality disorders.情绪、焦虑及人格障碍的变化。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Nov;44(11):1034-6, 1043. doi: 10.1176/ps.44.11.1034.
6
Symptom differences in major depression, dysthymia, panic disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder.重度抑郁症、恶劣心境、惊恐障碍和广泛性焦虑障碍的症状差异。
Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Feb;151(2):205-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.151.2.205.
7
Four clinical types of panic disorders.
Jpn J Psychiatry Neurol. 1992 Mar;46(1):37-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.1992.tb00817.x.
8
The National Institute of Mental Health Panic Questionnaire. An instrument for assessing clinical characteristics of panic disorder.美国国立精神卫生研究所惊恐问卷。一种评估惊恐障碍临床特征的工具。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1992 Sep;180(9):566-72. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199209000-00004.
9
Does the Beck Anxiety Inventory measure anything beyond panic attack symptoms?贝克焦虑量表所测量的是否超出了惊恐发作症状的范畴?
Behav Res Ther. 1996 Nov-Dec;34(11-12):949-54; discussion 955-61. doi: 10.1016/s0005-7967(96)00037-x.
10
Structural relationships among dimensions of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders and dimensions of negative affect, positive affect, and autonomic arousal.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版焦虑症和情绪障碍维度与消极情绪、积极情绪及自主神经唤醒维度之间的结构关系。
J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 May;107(2):179-92. doi: 10.1037//0021-843x.107.2.179.

引用本文的文献

1
Smoking Behavior and Alcohol Consumption in Individuals With Panic Attacks.惊恐发作个体的吸烟行为与饮酒情况
J Cogn Psychother. 2011 Feb 1;25(1):61-70. doi: 10.1891/0889-8391.25.1.61.
2
The panic attack-posttraumatic stress disorder model: applicability to orthostatic panic among Cambodian refugees.惊恐发作-创伤后应激障碍模型:对柬埔寨难民体位性惊恐的适用性。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2008;37(2):101-16. doi: 10.1080/16506070801969062.