Suppr超能文献

质子泵抑制剂对13C尿素呼气试验的掩盖作用取决于药物类型:奥美拉唑、泮托拉唑、兰索拉唑和埃索美拉唑之间的比较。

Masking of 13C urea breath test by proton pump inhibitors is dependent on type of medication: comparison between omeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole and esomeprazole.

作者信息

Levine A, Shevah O, Shabat-Sehayek V, Aeed H, Boaz M, Moss S F, Niv Y, Avni Y, Shirin H

机构信息

Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, The E. Wolfson Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Jul 1;20(1):117-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.02021.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The need to withhold acid suppression therapy while awaiting urea breath test results is a common clinical problem in symptomatic patients. It is unclear at present if the dose or type of proton pump inhibitor or the type of test meal govern the apparent masking effect of proton pump inhibitors on the urea breath test.

AIM

To prospectively evaluate Helicobacter pylori detection rates during treatment with four different proton pump inhibitors, utilizing a high-dose citric acid-based 13C urea breath test.

METHODS

Patients positive for Helicobacter pylori by urea breath test were randomized to receive either omeprazole 20 mg/day, pantoprazole 40 mg/day, lansoprazole 30 mg/day or esomeprazole 40 mg/day for 14 days. A repeat breath test was performed on day 14 of treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-nine patients, mean age 45.8 +/- 16.8, completed the study. Treatment with omeprazole or pantoprazole prior to urea breath test (UBT) was associated with low false negative results, while lansoprazole and esomeprazole caused clinically unacceptable high false negative rates (pantoprazole 2.2% vs. lansoprazole 16.6%, P = 0.02, vs. esomeprazole 13.6%, P = 0.05; omeprazole 4.1% vs. lansoprazole 16.6%, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Proton pump inhibitor-induced false negative results on high-dose citric acid based urea breath test vary with the type of proton pump inhibitor used. Selection of the appropriate test meal and proton pump inhibitor may allow symptomatic individuals to continue their proton pump inhibitors prior to performing a urea breath test.

摘要

背景

在等待尿素呼气试验结果期间停用抑酸治疗,这在有症状的患者中是一个常见的临床问题。目前尚不清楚质子泵抑制剂的剂量或类型以及试餐类型是否会影响质子泵抑制剂对尿素呼气试验的明显掩盖作用。

目的

利用高剂量柠檬酸基13C尿素呼气试验,前瞻性评估四种不同质子泵抑制剂治疗期间幽门螺杆菌的检测率。

方法

尿素呼气试验检测出幽门螺杆菌阳性的患者被随机分为四组,分别接受每日20毫克奥美拉唑、每日40毫克泮托拉唑、每日30毫克兰索拉唑或每日40毫克埃索美拉唑治疗14天。在治疗第14天进行重复呼气试验。

结果

179名患者完成了研究,平均年龄45.8±16.8岁。在尿素呼气试验(UBT)前使用奥美拉唑或泮托拉唑治疗时假阴性结果较低,而兰索拉唑和埃索美拉唑导致临床上不可接受的高假阴性率(泮托拉唑2.2% vs. 兰索拉唑16.6%,P = 0.02,vs. 埃索美拉唑13.6%,P = 0.05;奥美拉唑4.1% vs. 兰索拉唑16.6%,P = 0.05)。

结论

基于高剂量柠檬酸的尿素呼气试验中,质子泵抑制剂引起的假阴性结果因所用质子泵抑制剂的类型而异。选择合适的试餐和质子泵抑制剂可能使有症状的个体在进行尿素呼气试验前继续使用质子泵抑制剂。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验