Foead A, Penafort R, Saw A, Sengupta S
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Malaya Medical Center, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2004 Jun;12(1):76-82. doi: 10.1177/230949900401200114.
To conduct a prospective randomised controlled study to compare the stability and risk of nerve injury between fractures treated by medial-lateral pin fixation and those treated by 2-lateral pin fixation.
Patients with displaced supracondylar fractures admitted between May 2000 and December 2001 were recruited into the study. They were randomised to treatment either with medial-lateral pin fixation (n=34) or with 2-lateral pin fixation (n=32).
66 children with the mean age of 5.78 years were admitted during the study period. 11 of them were lost to follow-up. The mean follow-up period of the remaining 55 patients was 8.93 months. The difference in the carrying angle between injured and normal elbows was 3.57 degrees and 3.70 degrees in medial-lateral pin fixation and 2-lateral pin fixation, respectively. The extension and flexion loss was 7.14 degrees and 8.68 degrees respectively in medial-lateral pin fixation, and 7.11 degrees and 11.26 degrees respectively in 2-lateral pin fixation. The Baumann angle difference was 5.96 degrees in medial-lateral pin fixation, and 5.30 degrees in 2-lateral pin fixation. The difference in the medial epicondylar epiphyseal angle was 6.07 degrees in medial-lateral pin fixation and 6.92 degrees in 2-lateral pin fixation. Statistical analyses show that these differences are not significant. Five iatrogenic ulnar nerve injuries developed in the group treated by medial-lateral pin fixation, while 2 ulnar nerve and one radial nerve injuries were seen after 2-lateral pin fixation. Again the differences were not statistically significant.
Both methods of fixation were comparable in terms of stability, duration of bone healing, and risks of injury to the nerve.
进行一项前瞻性随机对照研究,比较内外侧穿针固定与双侧穿针固定治疗骨折时神经损伤的稳定性和风险。
招募2000年5月至2001年12月间收治的移位型髁上骨折患者。将他们随机分为内外侧穿针固定组(n = 34)或双侧穿针固定组(n = 32)进行治疗。
研究期间共收治66例平均年龄为5.78岁的儿童。其中11例失访。其余55例患者的平均随访期为8.93个月。内外侧穿针固定组和双侧穿针固定组受伤肘部与正常肘部的提携角差异分别为3.57度和3.70度。内外侧穿针固定组的伸直和屈曲丧失分别为7.14度和8.68度,双侧穿针固定组分别为7.11度和11.26度。内外侧穿针固定组的鲍曼角差异为5.96度,双侧穿针固定组为5.30度。内外侧穿针固定组的内上髁骨骺角差异为6.07度,双侧穿针固定组为6.92度。统计分析表明这些差异无统计学意义。内外侧穿针固定组发生5例医源性尺神经损伤,双侧穿针固定后出现2例尺神经损伤和1例桡神经损伤。差异同样无统计学意义。
两种固定方法在稳定性、骨愈合时间和神经损伤风险方面具有可比性。