Suppr超能文献

单一疗法治疗难治性慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的失败

Failure of a monotherapy strategy for difficult chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

作者信息

Nickel J Curtis, Downey Joe, Ardern Dale, Clark Janet, Nickel Kyle

机构信息

Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Urol. 2004 Aug;172(2):551-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000131592.98562.16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We determined the effect of a best evidence based monotherapeutic strategy for patients diagnosed with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) referred to a specialized prostatitis clinic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with CP/CPPS referred by urologists after failure of prescribed therapy for evaluation and treatment at Queen's University prostatitis research clinic were extensively evaluated, aggressively treated following a standardized treatment algorithm and followed for 1 year using a validated prostatitis specific symptom and quality of life instrument, the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). All patients underwent a standardized protocol for CP/CPPS including a history, physical examination, standard 4-glass test, plus urethral swab and semen for microscopy and culture, uroflowmetry and residual urine determination. Treatment followed a best evidence based strategy with a standardized monotherapy based algorithm.

RESULTS

A total of 100 consecutive patients with CP/CPPS (average age 42.2 years, range 20 to 70 and average symptom duration 6.5 years, range 0.5 to 39) had 1-year followup after initial evaluation. Patients were prescribed treatment based on documentation of "failed," "successful" and "never tried" therapies based on a standardized treatment algorithm. Patients treated successfully were continued on the prescribed therapy, while therapy was discontinued and new therapy instituted (based on algorithm) in those in whom the initially prescribed therapy failed. At 1 year there was a statistically significant decrease in total NIH-CPSI (23.3 to 19.5, p = 0.0004), pain (11.0 to 9.4, p = 0.03) and quality of life (7.7 to 6.1, p <0.001), but not voiding (4.6 to 4.0, p = 0.12). A perceptible 25% decrease in total NIH-CPSI symptom score was noted in 37% and the greatest improvement was in the quality of life domain (43% of patients had greater than 25% improvement in quality of life). Of the patients 35% had a significant decrease of greater than 6 points in total NIH-CPSI. A clear, clinically significant improvement in total NIH-CPSI (greater than 50% decrease) was noted in 19%.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately a third of patients with treatment refractory CP/CPPS undergoing extensive evaluation and therapy based on a sequential monotherapy treatment strategy in a specialized prostatitis clinic had at least modest improvement in symptoms during 1 year. This study confirms that a treatment strategy based on the sequential application of monotherapies for patients with a long history of severe CP/CPPS remains relatively poor.

摘要

目的

我们确定了一种基于最佳证据的单药治疗策略对转诊至专业前列腺炎诊所、被诊断为慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CP/CPPS)患者的疗效。

材料与方法

在皇后大学前列腺炎研究诊所,对经泌尿科医生转诊、规定治疗失败后前来评估和治疗的CP/CPPS患者进行了广泛评估,按照标准化治疗方案积极治疗,并使用经过验证的前列腺炎特异性症状和生活质量评估工具——美国国立卫生研究院慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)进行了1年的随访。所有患者均接受了针对CP/CPPS的标准化检查方案,包括病史、体格检查、标准四杯试验,以及尿道拭子和精液的显微镜检查与培养、尿流率测定和残余尿量测定。治疗遵循基于最佳证据的策略,采用基于标准化单药治疗的方案。

结果

共有100例连续的CP/CPPS患者(平均年龄42.2岁,范围20至70岁;平均症状持续时间6.5年,范围0.5至39年)在初次评估后进行了1年的随访。根据标准化治疗方案中“失败”“成功”和“从未尝试”治疗的记录为患者开出处方。治疗成功的患者继续接受规定治疗,而最初规定治疗失败的患者则停止该治疗并根据方案采用新的治疗方法。1年后,NIH-CPSI总分(从23.3降至19.5,p = 0.0004)、疼痛评分(从11.0降至9.4,p = 0.03)和生活质量评分(从7.7降至6.1,p <0.001)有统计学显著下降,但排尿评分(从4.6降至4.0,p = 0.12)无显著变化。37%的患者NIH-CPSI总分症状评分明显下降了25%,生活质量领域改善最为显著(43%的患者生活质量改善超过25%)。35%的患者NIH-CPSI总分显著下降超过6分。19%的患者NIH-CPSI总分有明显的、具有临床意义的改善(下降超过50%)。

结论

在专业前列腺炎诊所,约三分之一接受基于序贯单药治疗策略的广泛评估和治疗的难治性CP/CPPS患者在1年内症状至少有适度改善。本研究证实,对于有严重CP/CPPS长期病史的患者,基于序贯应用单药治疗的策略效果仍然相对较差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验