Lee Sang-Hun, Lee Byung-Cheol
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Urology and Nephrology, College of Oriental Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Urology. 2009 May;73(5):1036-41. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.10.047.
To investigate the clinical effect of electroacupuncture (EA) for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS).
We recruited 63 participants meeting the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria for CP/CPPS. After the inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied, 39 men were randomized to 3 treatment groups: group 1, advice and exercise plus 12 sessions of EA; group 2, advice and exercise plus 12 sessions of sham EA (SEA); and group 3, advice and exercise alone (A&E) for 6 weeks. A total of 6 acupuncture points were used to stimulate the sacral nerve and release the piriformis muscle using an electrical pulse generator. Symptoms related to CP/CPPS were assessed using the NIH-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). Prostaglandin E(2) and beta-endorphin levels in postmassage urine samples were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
At 6 weeks, the NIH-CPSI total score had decreased significantly in the EA group compared with the SEA and A&E groups (P < .001). On a subscale analysis of the NIH-CPSI, the EA group showed significant decreases in pain-related symptoms compared with the SEA and A&E groups (P < .01). All 12 EA participants experienced at least a 6-point decrease in the NIH-CPSI total score compared with 2 of 12 SEA participants (16.7%) and 3 of 12 A&E participants (25.0%; P < .0001). The mean prostaglandin E(2) level in the postmassage urine samples had significantly decreased in the EA group (P = .023). In contrast, it had increased in the other 2 groups.
In a 3-arm randomized trial investigating the clinical effects of EA on CP/CPPS, EA therapy proved to have independent therapeutic effects, particularly for pain relief superior to SEA or A&E therapy.
探讨电针(EA)治疗慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CP/CPPS)的临床疗效。
我们招募了63名符合美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)CP/CPPS共识标准的参与者。应用纳入/排除标准后,39名男性被随机分为3个治疗组:第1组,给予建议和运动加12次电针治疗;第2组,给予建议和运动加12次假电针(SEA)治疗;第3组,仅给予建议和运动(A&E),为期6周。总共使用6个穴位,通过电脉冲发生器刺激骶神经并放松梨状肌。使用NIH慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)评估与CP/CPPS相关的症状。采用酶联免疫吸附测定法测量按摩后尿液样本中前列腺素E2和β-内啡肽水平。
6周时,与SEA组和A&E组相比,EA组的NIH-CPSI总分显著降低(P <.001)。在NIH-CPSI的子量表分析中,与SEA组和A&E组相比,EA组疼痛相关症状显著减轻(P <.01)。与12名SEA参与者中的2名(16.7%)和12名A&E参与者中的3名(25.0%)相比,所有12名接受电针治疗的参与者的NIH-CPSI总分至少降低了6分(P <.0001)。EA组按摩后尿液样本中的前列腺素E2平均水平显著降低(P =.023)。相比之下,其他两组则升高。
在一项三臂随机试验中研究电针治疗CP/CPPS的临床疗效时,电针治疗被证明具有独立的治疗效果,尤其是在缓解疼痛方面优于假电针或仅给予建议和运动的治疗。