Jones Todd C
School of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Apr;11(2):362-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03196583.
Two experiments extended prior work on the perceptual specificity of priming to compound words not presented during a study phase. In both experiments, perceptual manipulations were employed, and priming was obtained on a word fragment completion test (e.g., c_ec_po_nt) where the lexical elements of the compounds (check and point) were presented in different study words. In Experiment 1, priming was highest when identical fragments for the lexical components were presented during the study phase (c_ec_list, needlepo_nt) and test phase (c_ec po_nt). In Experiment 2, visual study presentations, but not auditory study presentations, led to significant priming. The findings are consistent with predictions from transfer-appropriate processing and demonstrate perceptual, not lexical (post-perceptual), priming.
两项实验扩展了先前关于启动效应的知觉特异性的研究,将其应用于在学习阶段未呈现的复合词。在这两项实验中,都采用了知觉操纵,并在单词片段完成测试(例如,c_ec_po_nt)中获得了启动效应,其中复合词(check和point)的词汇元素出现在不同的学习单词中。在实验1中,当词汇成分的相同片段在学习阶段(c_ec_list,needlepo_nt)和测试阶段(c_ec po_nt)呈现时,启动效应最高。在实验2中,视觉学习呈现方式会导致显著的启动效应,而听觉学习呈现方式则不会。这些发现与迁移适当加工的预测一致,并证明了是知觉启动效应,而非词汇(后知觉)启动效应。