Weldon M S
Program in Experimental Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz 95064.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1991 May;17(3):526-41. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.17.3.526.
Four experiments examined perceptual, lexical, and conceptual processing effects in priming on word fragment completion (WFC) and perceptual identification (PID). In Experiment 1, visual words produced more priming than auditory or generated words, and pictures produced the least priming, suggesting that the effects of different encoding processes can be distinguished. In Experiments 2 and 3, Ss studied anagrams (e.g., tripocs), but only Ss instructed to think of the original words by mentally interchanging the vowels exhibited significant priming. Thus, lexical access is more important than surface similarity in priming. In Experiment 4, Ss studied compounds that either preserved the target's meaning (e.g., scotch bottle) or altered its meaning (e.g., scotch tape). Encoded meaning affected priming on WFC but not on PID, suggesting that conceptual processing plays a larger role in WFC. Overall the results suggest that priming must be understood in terms of multiple processes.
四项实验研究了启动对单词片段完成任务(WFC)和知觉识别任务(PID)的知觉、词汇和概念加工效应。在实验1中,视觉呈现的单词比听觉呈现或生成的单词产生的启动效应更强,而图片产生的启动效应最弱,这表明不同编码过程的效应是可以区分的。在实验2和实验3中,被试学习变位词(如tripocs),但只有那些被指示通过在心里交换元音来想出原词的被试表现出显著的启动效应。因此,在启动过程中,词汇通达比表面相似性更重要。在实验4中,被试学习要么保留目标词意义(如scotch bottle)要么改变其意义(如scotch tape)的复合词。编码意义影响了WFC任务的启动效应,但不影响PID任务的启动效应,这表明概念加工在WFC任务中发挥着更大的作用。总体而言,结果表明启动效应必须从多个过程的角度来理解。