• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Metamemorial influences in recognition memory: pictorial encoding reduces conjunction errors.

作者信息

Lloyd Marianne E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Seton Hall University, South Orange, New Jersey 07079, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2007 Jul;35(5):1067-73. doi: 10.3758/bf03193478.

DOI:10.3758/bf03193478
PMID:17910189
Abstract

Two experiments are presented that explore the role of the distinctiveness heuristic (e.g., Schacter, Israel, & Racine, 1999) on rates of conjunction errors as a function of encoding condition. The results of Experiment 1 demonstrate a reliable reduction of conjunction errors when participants study pictures relative to both reading words aloud and silently. Experiment 2 demonstrates that the nature of the pictures presented during the study phase is important for reducing conjunction errors. Collectively, the experiments demonstrate that participants can use the distinctiveness heuristic in addition to recall-to-reject strategies to avoid conjunction errors. These findings add to a growing body of literature that suggests that participants are able to use expectations for memory to guide their recognition decisions.

摘要

相似文献

1
Metamemorial influences in recognition memory: pictorial encoding reduces conjunction errors.
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jul;35(5):1067-73. doi: 10.3758/bf03193478.
2
The distinctiveness heuristic in false recognition and false recall.错误识别和错误回忆中的独特性启发法。
Memory. 2006 Jul;14(5):570-83. doi: 10.1080/09658210600624564.
3
False recognition of pictures versus words in Alzheimer's disease: the distinctiveness heuristic.阿尔茨海默病中对图片与文字的错误识别:独特性启发式策略
Neuropsychology. 2002 Apr;16(2):163-73. doi: 10.1037//0894-4105.16.2.163.
4
Production between and within: distinctiveness and the relative magnitude of the production effect.产生于个体之间和个体之内:独特性和产生效应的相对幅度。
Memory. 2021 Feb;29(2):168-179. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1868526. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
5
Reduced effects of pictorial distinctiveness on false memory following dynamic visual noise.动态视觉噪声后图片独特性对错误记忆的影响减弱
Memory. 2017 Jul;25(6):845-855. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1229793. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
6
Retrieval conditions and false recognition: testing the distinctiveness heuristic.检索条件与错误识别:检验独特性启发法
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Dec;8(4):827-33. doi: 10.3758/bf03196224.
7
Enhancing the production effect in memory.增强记忆中的生产效果。
Memory. 2013;21(8):904-15. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.766754. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
8
A closer look at children's metacognitive skills: The case of the distinctiveness heuristic.深入探究儿童的元认知技能:独特性启发式的案例
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Aug;172:130-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
9
Metacognition and false recognition in patients with frontal lobe lesions: the distinctiveness heuristic.额叶病变患者的元认知与错误识别:独特性启发法
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(6):860-71. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.09.011.
10
Increasing word distinctiveness eliminates the picture superiority effect in recognition: Evidence for the physical-distinctiveness account.增加单词独特性可消除识别中的图片优势效应:来自物理独特性解释的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Jan;47(1):182-193. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0858-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Expectation affects learning and modulates memory experience at retrieval.期望会影响学习,并在检索时调节记忆体验。
Cognition. 2018 Nov;180:123-134. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
2
Pre-stimulus neural activity predicts successful encoding of inter-item associations.刺激前神经活动可预测项目间关联的成功编码。
Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 15;105:21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.046. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
3
Contributions of familiarity and recollection rejection to recognition: evidence from the time course of false recognition for semantic and conjunction lures.

本文引用的文献

1
Developmental differences in false-event rejection: Effects of memorability-based warnings.
Memory. 2006 Aug;14(6):762-76. doi: 10.1080/09658210600648548.
2
Two types of recollection-based monitoring in younger and older adults: Recall-to-reject and the distinctiveness heuristic.年轻人和老年人中基于回忆的两种监测类型:回忆拒绝和独特性启发法。
Memory. 2006 Aug;14(6):730-41. doi: 10.1080/09658210600648506.
3
Editing (out) generated study words in a recognition exclusion task: Effects of response signal delay and generation procedure.在识别排除任务中编辑(删除)生成的研究词汇:反应信号延迟和生成程序的影响。
熟悉性和回忆拒绝对识别的贡献:来自语义和联合诱饵错误识别时间进程的证据。
Memory. 2011 Jan;19(1):1-16. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2010.530271.
4
Remembering words not presented in sentences: how study context changes patterns of false memories.记忆未出现在句子中的单词:学习情境如何改变错误记忆模式。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Jan;37(1):52-64. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.1.52.
Memory. 2006 Aug;14(6):712-29. doi: 10.1080/09658210600648480.
4
Models of recognition: a review of arguments in favor of a dual-process account.识别模型:对支持双过程理论观点的综述
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Feb;13(1):1-21. doi: 10.3758/bf03193807.
5
The development of the memorability-based strategy: insight from a training study.基于记忆性的策略发展:一项训练研究的见解
J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Jul;94(3):206-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.01.004. Epub 2006 Mar 24.
6
Binding, relational memory, and recall of naturalistic events: a developmental perspective.自然主义事件的联结、关系记忆与回忆:一种发展视角
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jan;32(1):89-100. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.89.
7
Speeded retrieval abolishes the false-memory suppression effect: evidence for the distinctiveness heuristic.快速检索消除了错误记忆抑制效应:独特性启发式的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Aug;12(4):726-31. doi: 10.3758/bf03196764.
8
Electrophysiological dissociation of picture versus word encoding: the distinctiveness heuristic as a retrieval orientation.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Aug;17(8):1181-93. doi: 10.1162/0898929055002517.
9
Study repetition and the rejection of conjunction lures.研究重复与对合取谬误的拒绝。
Memory. 2005 Jul;13(5):499-515. doi: 10.1080/09658210444000197.
10
Memory conjunction errors for autobiographical events: more than just familiarity.
Memory. 2004 May;12(3):288-300. doi: 10.1080/09658210244000621.