Heit Evan, Brockdorff Noellie, Lamberts Koen
Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, England.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Apr;11(2):380-6. doi: 10.3758/bf03196586.
In two experiments, the response signal technique (Reed, 1973) was combined with the DRM paradigm (e.g., McDermott & Roediger, 1998) to investigate the time course of false recognition memory--in particular, how this effect varies along the time course of generating a recognition judgment. Across the experiments, in addition to standard instructions, there were forewarning instructions encouraging the participants to avoid this effect, as well as inclusion instructions intended to enhance this tendency. It was found that the false memory effect was at its strongest at earlier response signals, diminishing when more time was given to make a recognition judgment. The forewarning instructions led to a more conservative overall response bias, rather than to a reduction of the effect. However, the participants were able to exaggerate this effect in the inclusion condition. The results are discussed in terms of the role of strategic processing in recognition memory.
在两项实验中,将反应信号技术(里德,1973年)与错误记忆范式(例如,麦克德莫特和罗德尼格,1998年)相结合,以研究错误识别记忆的时间进程——特别是这种效应如何在做出识别判断的时间进程中变化。在各项实验中,除了标准指导语外,还有预先警告指导语鼓励参与者避免这种效应,以及意图增强这种倾向的纳入指导语。结果发现,错误记忆效应在较早的反应信号时最为强烈,当给予更多时间做出识别判断时则会减弱。预先警告指导语导致了更保守的总体反应偏差,而不是效应的减少。然而,参与者能够在纳入条件下夸大这种效应。根据策略性加工在识别记忆中的作用对结果进行了讨论。