Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9660, USA.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1228-35. doi: 10.1037/a0024539.
The false memory effect produced by the Deese/Roediger & McDermott (DRM) paradigm is reportedly impervious to warnings to avoid false alarming to the critical lures (D. A. Gallo, H. L. Roediger III, & K. B. McDermott, 2001). This finding has been used as strong evidence against models that attribute the false alarms to a decision process (e.g., M. B. Miller & G. L. Wolford, 1999). In this report, the authors clarify their earlier article and suggest that subjects establish only 2 underlying criteria for a recognition judgment, a liberal criterion for items that seem to be related to 1 of the study list themes and a conservative criterion for items that do not seem to be related. They demonstrate that warnings designed on the basis of these underlying criteria are effective in significantly suppressing the false recognition effect, suggesting that strategic control of the retrieval response does play a role in the DRM paradigm.
Deese/Roediger 和 McDermott（DRM）范式产生的错误记忆效应据称不受避免对关键诱饵产生虚假警报的警告的影响（D. A. Gallo、H. L. Roediger III 和 K. B. McDermott，2001）。这一发现被用作反对将虚假警报归因于决策过程的模型的有力证据（例如，M. B. Miller 和 G. L. Wolford，1999）。在本报告中，作者澄清了他们之前的文章，并提出主题仅为识别判断建立了 2 个基本标准，一个宽松的标准用于那些似乎与研究主题之一相关的项目，以及一个保守的标准用于那些似乎不相关的项目。他们证明，基于这些基本标准设计的警告可以有效地显著抑制错误识别效应，这表明检索反应的策略控制确实在 DRM 范式中发挥了作用。
