Marsh Elizabeth J, Dolan Patrick O
Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0086, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Jun;14(3):479-83. doi: 10.3758/bf03194093.
Of interest was whether prior testing of related words primes false memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. After studying lists of related words, subjects made old-new judgments about zero, three, or six related items before being tested on critical nonpresented lures. When the recognition test was self-paced, prior testing of list items led to faster false recognition judgments, but did not increase the rate of false alarms to lures from studied lists. Critically, this pattern changed when decision making at test was speeded. When forced to respond quickly--presumably precluding the use of monitoring processes--clear test-induced priming effects were observed in the rate of false memories. The results are consistent with an activation-monitoring explanation of false memories and support that retrieving veridical memories can be a source of memory error.
有趣的是,在Deese/Roediger-McDermott(DRM)范式中,对相关单词的先前测试是否会引发错误记忆。在学习相关单词列表后,受试者对零个、三个或六个相关项目进行新旧判断,然后再对关键的未呈现诱饵进行测试。当识别测试是自我节奏时,对列表项目的先前测试会导致更快的错误识别判断,但不会增加对来自学习列表的诱饵的误报率。至关重要的是,当测试时的决策速度加快时,这种模式就会改变。当被迫快速做出反应时——大概排除了使用监控过程——在错误记忆率中观察到了明显的测试诱导启动效应。这些结果与错误记忆的激活监控解释一致,并支持检索真实记忆可能是记忆错误的一个来源。