Arsenio William F, Lemerise Elizabeth A
Ferkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Child Dev. 2004 Jul-Aug;75(4):987-1002. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00720.x.
Social information processing and moral domain theories have developed in relative isolation from each other despite their common focus on intentional harm and victimization, and mutual emphasis on social cognitive processes in explaining aggressive, morally relevant behaviors. This article presents a selective summary of these literatures with the goal of showing how they can be integrated into a single, coherent model. An essential aspect of this integration is Crick and Dodge's (1994) distinction between latent mental structures and online processing. It is argued that moral domain theory is relevant for describing underlying mental structures regarding the nature and boundaries of what is moral, whereas the social information processing model describes the online information processing that affects application of moral structures during peer interactions.
尽管社会信息加工理论和道德领域理论都共同关注故意伤害和受害行为，并且在解释具有道德相关性的攻击性行为时都相互强调社会认知过程，但它们一直是相对独立发展的。本文对这些文献进行了选择性总结，目的是展示如何将它们整合为一个统一、连贯的模型。这种整合的一个重要方面是克里克和道奇（1994）对潜在心理结构和在线加工的区分。有人认为，道德领域理论适用于描述关于道德的本质和界限的潜在心理结构，而社会信息加工模型则描述了在同伴互动过程中影响道德结构应用的在线信息加工。
