Beck Robert J
School of Education, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 16;15:1397547. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1397547. eCollection 2024.
This evolutionary developmental study employed an experimental recursive narrative ecological niche, comparing scaffolded mother-child (5-year-old) pairs to unassisted controls as they independently viewed and discussed a realistic fictional family video depicting a father-daughter emotional conflict over the girl's risky behavior, which violated harm/care and fairness/justice moral foundation norms. A microgenetic analysis was conducted on a selected variant pair that demonstrated high adaptive fitness in the niche by employing developmentally advanced cooperative scaffolding tools. The conversational ecosystem phase was characterized by repeated maternal theory-oriented "why" questions and coordinated child causal responses, forming a joint epistemic investigation that facilitated the child's moral understanding of the characters' responsibilities and motives. The pair used quasi-justice procedures to gather evidence, judge, and construct moral attributes for the characters. Their conversational mechanism was supported by mutual mindreading, mental time travel, and empathic communications, as they interacted simultaneously with each other and the story characters. A narrative ecological scaffolding theory emerged, establishing a standard for cooperative epistemic scaffolding between the mother and the child. Future training programs should utilize the Zone of Proximal Development method to instruct similar parent-child pairs.
这项进化发展研究采用了一种实验性递归叙事生态位,将有支架辅助的母婴(5岁)对与无辅助的对照组进行比较,当他们独立观看并讨论一段真实的虚构家庭视频时,视频描绘了父女之间因女孩的危险行为而产生的情感冲突,这种行为违反了伤害/关爱和公平/正义的道德基础规范。对一组选定的变异对进行了微观发生分析,该变异对通过运用发展上先进的合作支架工具在生态位中表现出高度的适应性。对话生态系统阶段的特点是母亲反复提出以理论为导向的“为什么”问题,以及孩子协调的因果回应,形成了一个联合认知调查,促进了孩子对角色责任和动机的道德理解。这对母婴使用准司法程序来收集证据、判断并构建角色的道德属性。他们的对话机制得到了相互心理解读、心理时间旅行和移情交流的支持,因为他们彼此之间以及与故事角色同时进行互动。一种叙事生态支架理论应运而生,为母婴之间的合作认知支架建立了一个标准。未来的培训项目应采用最近发展区方法来指导类似的亲子对。