Suppr超能文献

利用基因型数据在一组与性状相关的基因中鉴定易感基因。

Identifying the susceptibility gene(s) in a set of trait-linked genes using genotype data.

作者信息

Yuan Ao, Chen Guanjie, Chen Yuanxiu, Rotimi Charles, Bonney George E

机构信息

Statistical Genetics and Bioinformatics Unit, National Human Genome Center, Howard University, Washington, DC 20059, USA.

出版信息

Genetics. 2004 Jul;167(3):1445-59. doi: 10.1534/genetics.103.021600.

Abstract

There are generally three steps to isolate a disease linkage-susceptibility gene: genome-wide scan, fine mapping, and, last, positional cloning. The last step is time consuming and involves intensive laboratory work. In some cases, fine mapping cannot proceed further on a set of markers because they are tightly linked. For years, genetic statisticians have been trying different ways to narrow the fine-mapping results to provide some guidance for the next step of laboratory work. Although these methods are practical and efficient, most of them are based on IBD data, which usually can be inferred only from the genotype data with some uncertainty. The corresponding methods thus have no greater power than one using genotype data directly. Also, IBD-based methods apply only to relative pair data. Here, using genotype data, we have developed a statistical hypothesis-testing method to pinpoint a SNP, or SNPs, suspected of responsibility for a disease trait linkage among a set of SNPs tightly linked in a region. Our method uses genotype data of affected individuals or case-control studies, which are widely available in the laboratory. The testing statistic can be constructed using any genotype-based disease-marker disequilibrium measure and is asymptotically distributed as a chi-square mixture. This method can be used for singleton data, relative pair data, or general pedigree data. We have applied the method to simulated data as well as a real data set; it gives satisfactory results.

摘要

分离疾病连锁易感性基因通常有三个步骤

全基因组扫描、精细定位,最后是位置克隆。最后一步耗时且涉及大量实验室工作。在某些情况下,由于一组标记紧密连锁,精细定位无法在这些标记上进一步推进。多年来,遗传统计学家一直在尝试不同方法来缩小精细定位结果,为下一步实验室工作提供一些指导。尽管这些方法实用且高效,但大多数基于IBD数据,而IBD数据通常只能从基因型数据中带有一定不确定性地推断出来。因此,相应方法并不比直接使用基因型数据的方法更具效力。此外,基于IBD的方法仅适用于相对对数据。在此,我们利用基因型数据开发了一种统计假设检验方法,以在一个区域紧密连锁的一组单核苷酸多态性(SNP)中确定一个或多个涉嫌与疾病性状连锁相关的SNP。我们的方法使用受影响个体的基因型数据或病例对照研究数据,这些数据在实验室中广泛可得。检验统计量可以使用任何基于基因型的疾病标记不平衡度量来构建,并且渐近分布为卡方混合分布。该方法可用于单例数据、相对对数据或一般家系数据。我们已将该方法应用于模拟数据以及一个真实数据集;结果令人满意。

相似文献

5
Combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping for genome screens.用于基因组筛选的联合连锁和连锁不平衡定位
Genet Epidemiol. 2000 Oct;19(3):211-34. doi: 10.1002/1098-2272(200010)19:3<211::AID-GEPI3>3.0.CO;2-L.
6
Fine-scale genetic mapping using independent component analysis.使用独立成分分析的精细尺度基因定位。
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2008 Jul-Sep;5(3):448-60. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2007.1072.
8
Association mapping: methodologies, strategies, and issues.
Genet Epidemiol. 2005;29 Suppl 1:S77-85. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20113.
9
Fine mapping of disease genes using tagging SNPs.利用标签单核苷酸多态性对疾病基因进行精细定位。
Ann Hum Genet. 2007 Nov;71(Pt 6):815-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2007.00379.x. Epub 2007 Jun 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Haplotype inference in random population samples.随机人群样本中的单倍型推断
Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Nov;71(5):1129-37. doi: 10.1086/344347. Epub 2002 Oct 17.
2
Combined linkage and association analysis in pedigrees.家系中的联合连锁与关联分析。
Genet Epidemiol. 2001;21 Suppl 1:S358-63. doi: 10.1002/gepi.2001.21.s1.s358.
4
Genomic control for association studies.关联研究的基因组控制
Biometrics. 1999 Dec;55(4):997-1004. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00997.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验