Cardon Greet, De Clercq Dirk, De Bourdeaudhuij Ilse, Breithecker Dieter
Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Watersportlaan 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Aug;54(2):133-42. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00215-5.
This study evaluated differences in sitting habits in the classroom between the project "Moving school" and a traditional school in 8-year-old children. Twenty-two children, since 1.5 years involved in the project were compared to 25 children in a traditional school. Making use of the Portable Ergonomic Observation (PEO) method, it was observed that children from a traditional school spend an average of 97% of the lesson time sitting statically, from which one-third with the trunk bend over 45 degrees. In the "Moving school" this posture was replaced by dynamic sitting (53%), standing (31%) and walking around (10%), while trunk flexion over 45 degrees was nearly not observed. Children from the "Moving school" also showed significantly less neck and trunk rotation. Additionally, accelerometric data showed significantly more physical activity in lessons of the "Moving school". Rates of self-reported back or neck pain did not differ significantly between both study groups. Results show that sitting habits are more favourable in a "Moving school". Further research is needed to study the impact of implementing "Moving school" concepts in traditional schools on sitting habits.
本研究评估了“移动学校”项目中的8岁儿童与传统学校儿童在课堂上坐姿习惯的差异。将自1.5岁起参与该项目的22名儿童与一所传统学校的25名儿童进行了比较。利用便携式人体工程学观察(PEO)方法观察到,传统学校的儿童平均有97%的上课时间保持静态坐姿,其中三分之一的儿童躯干弯曲超过45度。在“移动学校”,这种姿势被动态坐姿(53%)、站立(31%)和四处走动(10%)所取代,而几乎未观察到躯干弯曲超过45度的情况。“移动学校”的儿童颈部和躯干的旋转也明显更少。此外,加速度计数据显示,“移动学校”的课堂上身体活动明显更多。两个研究组自我报告的背部或颈部疼痛发生率没有显著差异。结果表明,“移动学校”的坐姿习惯更有利。需要进一步研究在传统学校实施“移动学校”理念对坐姿习惯的影响。