Ryser Faun G
University of Texas-Houston, School of Nursing, 77030, USA.
J Hum Lact. 2004 Aug;20(3):300-5. doi: 10.1177/0890334404266985.
This study compared breastfeeding attitudes, intention, and initiation among low-income women exposed or not exposed to the Best Start program. A between- (experimental vs control group) and within-factor (pretest vs posttest) repeated measures design was employed. A nonprobability sample of 54 subjects was randomly assigned to a control group (n = 28) or an experimental group (n = 26). Using the Breastfeeding Attrition Prediction Tool, statistically significant group by time interaction effects were found for negative breastfeeding sentiment, positive breastfeeding sentiment, and breastfeeding control scales. Compared to the control group, the experimental group had significantly increased positive breastfeeding sentiment (P <.01), decreased negative breastfeeding sentiment (P <.01), and increased breastfeeding control (P <.01) from pretest to posttest. Following exposure to the Best Start program, subjects in the experimental group showed statistically significantly higher breastfeeding intention and initiation than did those in the control group. Practical implications are discussed.
本研究比较了接触或未接触“最佳开端”项目的低收入女性的母乳喂养态度、意愿及开始情况。采用了组间(实验组与对照组)和组内因素(前测与后测)重复测量设计。54名受试者的非概率样本被随机分配到对照组(n = 28)或实验组(n = 26)。使用母乳喂养损耗预测工具,发现消极母乳喂养情绪、积极母乳喂养情绪和母乳喂养控制量表在组间和时间上存在显著的交互效应。与对照组相比,实验组从前测到后测,积极母乳喂养情绪显著增加(P <.01),消极母乳喂养情绪显著降低(P <.01),母乳喂养控制能力增强(P <.01)。接触“最佳开端”项目后,实验组受试者的母乳喂养意愿和开始情况在统计学上显著高于对照组。文中讨论了实际意义。