Uzicanin Amra, Zhou Fangjun, Eggers Rudi, Webb Elize, Strebel Peter
Global Immunization Division, National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, MS E-05, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.
Vaccine. 2004 Sep 3;22(25-26):3419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.02.042.
To evaluate economic implications of conducting a "catch-up" measles vaccination campaign, we conducted an economic analysis of the 1996-1997 measles immunization campaign in two provinces of South Africa comparing the baseline two-dose routine immunization program to the combined vaccination strategy (routine two-dose immunization program, plus the 1996-1997 campaign). The study findings indicate that the 1996-1997 mass measles immunization campaign was cost-effective in both study provinces, and cost-saving in the province with higher pre-campaign disease incidence and lower routine vaccination coverage. An early investment in effective vaccination strategies that rapidly reduce disease burden apparently results in better returns, both epidemiologically and economically.
为评估开展“补种”麻疹疫苗接种运动的经济影响,我们对南非两个省份1996 - 1997年的麻疹免疫运动进行了经济分析,将基线两剂常规免疫计划与联合疫苗接种策略(常规两剂免疫计划加上1996 - 1997年的运动)进行比较。研究结果表明,1996 - 1997年的大规模麻疹免疫运动在两个研究省份均具有成本效益,并且在运动前疾病发病率较高且常规疫苗接种覆盖率较低的省份还节省了成本。对能迅速减轻疾病负担的有效疫苗接种策略进行早期投资,显然在流行病学和经济方面都能带来更好的回报。